Re: aspell 0.60.6.1-1 does not install any dictionaries by default (RE: git gui 1.7.9-1: "spell checking is unavailable" error message)

2012-11-08 Thread Matt Seitz
From: Andrey Repin > So it seems like the options are: 1. Change git-gui and other "aspell" based applications to suppress their error message when the "default" dictionary is specified and no dictionary is present. Specified where? Sorry, I wasn't clear. The "git-gui" program is jus

Re: aspell 0.60.6.1-1 does not install any dictionaries by default (RE: git gui 1.7.9-1: "spell checking is unavailable" error message)

2012-11-08 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, Matt Seitz! >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494084 >>> >>> Does it make sense for Cygwin to follow Fedora's lead, and install >>> "aspell-en" by default when "aspell" is installed? >> >> No, it makes sense to report this issue to Git maintaners. > OK, I can do that. >

Re: aspell 0.60.6.1-1 does not install any dictionaries by default (RE: git gui 1.7.9-1: "spell checking is unavailable" error message)

2012-11-08 Thread Matt Seitz
From: Matt Seitz From: Matt Seitz > I looked through "setup.log". I see that something triggered "aspell" > to > be installed on Nov. 5: > What's the best way for me to determine which packaged triggered adding the required dependency "aspell"? I'm suspecting the problem has something

Re: aspell 0.60.6.1-1 does not install any dictionaries by default (RE: git gui 1.7.9-1: "spell checking is unavailable" error message)

2012-11-08 Thread Matt Seitz
From: Matt Seitz I looked through "setup.log". I see that something triggered "aspell" to be installed on Nov. 5: 2012/11/05 06:48:59 Adding required dependency aspell: Selecting version 0.60.6.1-1 for installation. 2012/11/05 06:48:59 Adding required dependency libaspell15: Selecting versi

Re: aspell 0.60.6.1-1 does not install any dictionaries by default (RE: git gui 1.7.9-1: "spell checking is unavailable" error message)

2012-11-08 Thread Matt Seitz
From: Andrey Repin From: Matt Seitz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494084 Does it make sense for Cygwin to follow Fedora's lead, and install "aspell-en" by default when "aspell" is installed? No, it makes sense to report this issue to Git maintaners. OK, I can do that. Howe

Re: aspell 0.60.6.1-1 does not install any dictionaries by default (RE: git gui 1.7.9-1: "spell checking is unavailable" error message)

2012-11-08 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, Matt Seitz! > It looks like the Fedora team originally installed the "aspell-en" > dictionary by default whenever "aspell" was installed. Then they dropped it > as a dependency for the same reason given earlier in this thread: that it's > not really required for "aspell". Then they ma

Re: aspell

2006-10-13 Thread Gareth Pearce
On 10/12/06, Gareth Pearce I suspect you don't have nroff installed. If that is not the problem, it works for me - That would be too easy. I already check that and nroff is indeed installed. As for "works for" you, I suspect that you have an old version of aspell. I am talking abou

Re: aspell

2006-10-12 Thread Wynfield Henman
> Symptom: (run the following on the bash or zsh command line) >$ aspell -a -m -d american >Error: nroff: dlopen returned "No such file or directory". On 10/12/06, Gareth Pearce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: . I suspect you don't have nroff installed. If that is not the probl

Re: aspell

2006-10-12 Thread Gareth Pearce
Wynfield Henman wrote: I am trying to run down a problem with using aspell with cygwin. aspell: International Ispell Version 3.1.20 (but really Aspell 0.60.4) Cygwin: CYGWIN_NT-5.1 1.5.21(0.156/4/2) 2006-07-30 Symptom: (run the following on the bash or zsh command line)

RE: Aspell - Ispell

2004-04-01 Thread Gareth Pearce
> Gareth Pearce wrote: > > > It should be relatively easy to write a very simple script called ispell > > which calls 'aspell -a $@' > > I think that works at least... can't say I've tried it. > > Such a script exists: /usr/share/aspell/ispell > > An obvious way to make it available to programs

Re: Aspell - Ispell

2004-04-01 Thread Andreas Seidl
Gareth Pearce wrote: It should be relatively easy to write a very simple script called ispell which calls 'aspell -a $@' I think that works at least... can't say I've tried it. Such a script exists: /usr/share/aspell/ispell An obvious way to make it available to programs would be: cd /usr/bin

Re: Aspell - Ispell

2004-03-29 Thread Steven E. Harris
Andy Rushton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Or is it possible to use aspell within emacs? On XEmacs at least, this is all it takes: (eval-after-load "ispell" '(progn (setq ispell-program-name "aspell"))) I load those forms from my init file and aspell works just as ispell did before. All

RE: Aspell - Ispell

2004-03-29 Thread Gareth Pearce
> > > > > I would support this for another reason: ispell is integrated with the > various emacsen and gives my such features as flyspell (on-the-fly spell > check). I just did a clean reinstall of Cygwin and spent a while > tracking down the latest ispell release - it would be som much better if >

Re: Aspell - Ispell

2004-03-29 Thread Andy Rushton
Gregory Borota wrote: But still I *personally* would prefer if Pierre A. Humblet's Ispell port would be part of cygwin distribution too as his ispell is much faster than current aspell (at least for english). I tried to use aspell it just makes me mad, it's so extremely slow. I had to switch back

Re: aspell within cygwin?

2003-01-18 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 03:25:04PM +0100, Thorsten Kampe wrote: >* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (03-01-18 15:03 +0100) >> how can I use aspell in conjunction with Cygwin > >./configure >make >make install > >> (vim)? > >man aspell >man vim Heh. Dunno why but this made me LOL. Sorry for the off-topic observ

Re: aspell within cygwin?

2003-01-18 Thread Thorsten Kampe
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (03-01-18 15:03 +0100) > how can I use aspell in conjunction with Cygwin ./configure make make install > (vim)? man aspell man vim Thorsten -- Content-Type: text/explicit; charset=ISO-8859-666 (Parental Advisory) Content-Transfer-Warning: message contains innuendos not su