On Feb 6 00:17, Vasiliy wrote:
> Re: Updated: setup.exe (Release 2.867)
> Re: Updated: gcc-4.9.2-2 (x86/x86_64)
>
>
> Dear Cygwin Team,
>
> i) I refer to [1], more recently to [2]:
>
> "The most visible effect is that Setup will now never downgrade a package."
Yeah, the idea was that there's
Marco Atzeri writes:
> strange as 4.9.2-2 is current for both architecture
>
> $ cygcheck -cd|grep gcc
> gcc-core4.9.2-2
> gcc-fortran 4.9.2-2
> gcc-g++ 4.9.2-2
>
> It could be a side effect of a messy setup
On 2/6/2015 12:17 AM, Vasiliy wrote:
Re: Updated: setup.exe (Release 2.867)
Re: Updated: gcc-4.9.2-2 (x86/x86_64)
Dear Cygwin Team,
i) I refer to [1], more recently to [2]:
"The most visible effect is that Setup will now never downgrade a package."
It downgrades the "gcc" package from 4.9.2-
Re: Updated: setup.exe (Release 2.867)
Re: Updated: gcc-4.9.2-2 (x86/x86_64)
Dear Cygwin Team,
i) I refer to [1], more recently to [2]:
"The most visible effect is that Setup will now never downgrade a package."
It downgrades the "gcc" package from 4.9.2-2 to 4.9.2-1 right now [3].
ii) Would
4 matches
Mail list logo