Re: Re Re: Re: UNIX Sockets - Broadcast address

2002-12-18 Thread Patrick Lidstone
>On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 03:37:13AM +, Kay M wrote: >> So what the bottom line, no broadcasting ?. >> >> Question: Has any one ever written a program on cygwin that uses A broadcast >> address ?. A client program to be more specific. > >What about actually debugging the problem? Or did you t

Re: Re: Re Re: Re: UNIX Sockets - Broadcast address

2001-12-17 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 11:20:09PM +, Kay M wrote: >I dont know advanced debugging. Sounds like it is time to learn. cgf >I just know how to write programs in C. I dont know how to write >wrapper functions etc...or any Windows WINSOCK API programming. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygw

Re: Re: Re Re: Re: UNIX Sockets - Broadcast address

2001-12-17 Thread Kay M
I dont know advanced debugging. I just know how to write programs in C. I dont know how to write wrapper functions etc...or any Windows WINSOCK API programming. But the question of anyone writing a program client that binds to the broadcast address should be one with a answer (common scenario,

Re: Re Re: Re: UNIX Sockets - Broadcast address

2001-12-17 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 03:37:13AM +, Kay M wrote: > So what the bottom line, no broadcasting ?. > > Question: Has any one ever written a program on cygwin that uses A broadcast > address ?. A client program to be more specific. What about actually debugging the problem? Or did you try usi

Re Re: Re: UNIX Sockets - Broadcast address

2001-12-16 Thread Kay M
So what the bottom line, no broadcasting ?. Question: Has any one ever written a program on cygwin that uses A broadcast address ?. A client program to be more specific. On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 08:08:15AM +, Kay M wrote: >Yup, Like I said Ok with LINUX, so ? > >What could be wrong ?. REME

Re: Re: UNIX Sockets - Broadcast address

2001-12-13 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 08:08:15AM +, Kay M wrote: > Yup, Like I said Ok with LINUX, so ? > > What could be wrong ?. REMEMBER its the bind()ing function that gives an > error!. Even with no server just client, bind()ing gives error. Dunno. The error code is returned by a WinSock function.

Re: Re: UNIX Sockets - Broadcast address

2001-12-13 Thread Kay M
Yup, Like I said Ok with LINUX, so ? What could be wrong ?. REMEMBER its the bind()ing function that gives an error!. Even with no server just client, bind()ing gives error. If you can show me an example of a working server/client on the broadcast address Id be interested to see the code. he

Re: UNIX Sockets - Broadcast address

2001-12-12 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 02:36:10AM +, Kay M wrote: > OK I didnt mean connecting in the socket API sense.erm but when bind > takes place an error is given. I specified 127.255.255.255 and even > INADDR_BROADCAST..still same error. > > Even tried some demo files from socket book. # >