Re: Status of Cygwin on Windows/ARM64?

On 2024-09-08 07:45, Mark Liam Brown via Cygwin wrote: On Sun, Sep 8, 2024 at 10:50 AM Arthur Norman wrote: I have been VERY happily pleased about how well Cygwin runs using Prism on Windows/ARM64. I can build and test my x86_64 code there using it despite the underlying CPU being an ARM. My g

Re: Status of Cygwin on Windows/ARM64?

On Sun, Sep 8, 2024 at 10:50 AM Arthur Norman wrote: > > I have been VERY happily pleased about how well Cygwin runs using > Prism on Windows/ARM64. I can build and test my x86_64 code there using it > despite the underlying CPU being an ARM. My genuine Windows/x86_64 machine > is not that new the

Re: Status of Cygwin on Windows/ARM64?

I have been VERY happily pleased about how well Cygwin runs using Prism on Windows/ARM64. I can build and test my x86_64 code there using it despite the underlying CPU being an ARM. My genuine Windows/x86_64 machine is not that new these days. Using a stack Macbook-m1/UTM/Windows11-ARM64 runs t

Re: Status of Xemacs on cygwin64. Is help needed?

> Henry S Thompson writes: > Anibal Morales writes: >> I don't have a lot of free time but I miss my Xemacs. If I can make >> a difference I would like to volunteer and help release this >> package but I am a total cygwin package noob. > Unfortunately it isn't (just) a

Re: Status of Xemacs on cygwin64. Is help needed?

Anibal Morales writes: > I don't have a lot of free time but I miss my Xemacs. If I can make > a difference I would like to volunteer and help release this > package but I am a total cygwin package noob. Unfortunately it isn't (just) a packaging matter. Getting xemacs to compile for 64-bit c

Re: Status of large address awareness?

On 3/16/2012 9:15 PM, Ryan Johnson wrote: Hi all, What's the current status of large address awareness for cygwin binaries? I know at one point it seemed to be working well -- other than an issue with emacs (fixed now?) -- and there was talk of making it the The emacs problem was fixed last Au

Re: Status

From: m...@democracynow.org Subject: Thank you for your email. Hello, Thank you for your message. Your feedback is very important to us. Although we read all the messages we receive, the volume of email we get makes it impossible to respond individually. If your message falls into one of the cat

Re: status of gcc4 -ffast-math

Dave Korn wrote: Hans Horn wrote: Do you where this gobble stuff ‘ comes from, btw? GCC is trying to use the appropriate set of internationalized opening and closing single-quote marks. If you "export LC_LANG=C.ASCII", you'll get regular apostrophes. It's -fno-leading-underscore. Have

Re: status of gcc4 -ffast-math

Hans Horn wrote: >> >> Do you where this gobble stuff ‘ comes from, btw? GCC is trying to use the appropriate set of internationalized opening and closing single-quote marks. If you "export LC_LANG=C.ASCII", you'll get regular apostrophes. > It's -fno-leading-underscore. > Have to see wheth

Re: status of gcc4 -ffast-math

Hans Horn wrote: Dave Korn wrote: Hans Horn wrote: Folks, what is the current status of -ffast-math for gcc4 under cygwin. I tried to use it for some numerical C code and get the following link errors: eval.o:eval.c:(.text+0x79c): undefined reference to `_f_pow' eval.o:eval.c:(.text+0x7d8):

Re: status of gcc4 -ffast-math

Dave Korn wrote: Hans Horn wrote: Folks, what is the current status of -ffast-math for gcc4 under cygwin. I tried to use it for some numerical C code and get the following link errors: eval.o:eval.c:(.text+0x79c): undefined reference to `_f_pow' eval.o:eval.c:(.text+0x7d8): undefined referenc

Re: status of gcc4 -ffast-math

Hans Horn wrote: > Folks, > > what is the current status of -ffast-math for gcc4 under cygwin. > > I tried to use it for some numerical C code and get the following link > errors: > > eval.o:eval.c:(.text+0x79c): undefined reference to `_f_pow' > eval.o:eval.c:(.text+0x7d8): undefined reference

Re: Status of Compatibility with Windows Server 2008 (2k8)

Oren Elrad wrote: Perhaps it's bad form to reply to my own message, but I've got the 2k8 installation (x86) up and running and I'm ready to take the plunge and report back on what works and what doesn't work. Should I use the 1.5 release on the main page, or use the 1.7 release (setup-1.7.exe)?

Re: Status of Compatibility with Windows Server 2008 (2k8)

Perhaps it's bad form to reply to my own message, but I've got the 2k8 installation (x86) up and running and I'm ready to take the plunge and report back on what works and what doesn't work. Should I use the 1.5 release on the main page, or use the 1.7 release (setup-1.7.exe)? Alternatively, shoul

Re: status of utf-8 patch

. Reformatted. Ariel Burbaickij wrote: On 7/9/07, Larry Hall (Cygwin) cygwin com> wrote: ^^ Please, let's not feed the spammers. Matt

Re: status of utf-8 patch

Have you some outlines of this something given WIn 9x support can be dropped, indeed? On 7/9/07, Larry Hall (Cygwin) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Matt Seitz wrote: > "Brian Dessent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Ariel Burbaickij wrote: >> >>> question: what is t

Re: status of utf-8 patch

Matt Seitz wrote: "Brian Dessent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ariel Burbaickij wrote: question: what is the status of utf-8 patch fo cygwin? Is it You can find all the details in the mailing list archives.

Re: status of utf-8 patch

"Brian Dessent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Ariel Burbaickij wrote: > >> question: what is the status of utf-8 patch fo cygwin? Is it > > You can find all the details in the mailing list archives. >

Re: status of utf-8 patch

Yes, I somehow have overseen it. Mea culpa and sorry about it. Thank you for pointing to it. /wbr Ariel Burbaickij On 7/9/07, Larry Hall (Cygwin) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: . Reformatted. Ariel Burbaickij wrote: > On 7/9/07, Larry Hall (Cygwin) cygwincom> wr

Re: status of utf-8 patch

Ariel Burbaickij wrote: Yes, I somehow have overseen it. Mea culpa and sorry about it. Thank you for pointing to it. No problem. Good luck. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd.

Re: status of utf-8 patch

. Reformatted. Ariel Burbaickij wrote: On 7/9/07, Larry Hall (Cygwin) cygwincom> wrote: ^^^ . Thanks. Ariel Burbaickij wrote: > On 7/9/07, Brian

Re: status of utf-8 patch

Well, I do not know his e-mail. Do you? On 7/9/07, Larry Hall (Cygwin) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ariel Burbaickij wrote: > On 7/9/07, Brian Dessent wrote: >> Ariel Burbaickij wrote: >> >> > question: what is the status of utf-8 patch fo cygwin? Is it >> >> You can find all the details in the m

Re: status of utf-8 patch

Ariel Burbaickij wrote: On 7/9/07, Brian Dessent wrote: Ariel Burbaickij wrote: > question: what is the status of utf-8 patch fo cygwin? Is it You can find all the details in the mailing list archives. > endorsed/supported? It

Re: status of utf-8 patch

Yes, my hope is of course that he also reads the mailing list. On 7/9/07, Brian Dessent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ariel Burbaickij wrote: > question: what is the status of utf-8 patch fo cygwin? Is it You can find all the details in the mailing list archives.

Re: status of utf-8 patch

Ariel Burbaickij wrote: > question: what is the status of utf-8 patch fo cygwin? Is it You can find all the details in the mailing list archives. > endorsed/supported? It was submitted and rejected on technical grounds, which mea

Re: Status of hstrerror() and h_errno in cygwin and one more important question

On 04/10/2007, Eric Lilja wrote: Dave Korn wrote: > On 09 April 2007 22:35, Eric Lilja wrote: >> Since the program is exiting its memory is bound to be >> returned anyway, but this still annoys me to no end. I just wrote a >> console version which I thought I could use as a simpler test case

Re: Status of hstrerror() and h_errno in cygwin and one more important question

Brian Dessent wrote: Eric Lilja wrote: I'm developing a very simple IRC bot (written in C++) with a gui using the cygwin tools. I use Win32 for the gui and I use cygwin sockets and pthreads for communicating with the server. Anyway, I found h_errno/hstrerror() to be useful when dealing with ge

Re: Status of hstrerror() and h_errno in cygwin and one more important question

Dave Korn wrote: On 09 April 2007 22:35, Eric Lilja wrote: I'm developing a very simple IRC bot (written in C++) with a gui using the cygwin tools. Also, and more importantly, I'm having a weird core dump in my application. The program is very simple, when launched you can connect to an irc

Re: Status of hstrerror() and h_errno in cygwin and one more important question

Eric Lilja wrote: > I'm developing a very simple IRC bot (written in C++) with a gui using > the cygwin tools. I use Win32 for the gui and I use cygwin sockets and > pthreads for communicating with the server. > > Anyway, I found h_errno/hstrerror() to be useful when dealing with > gethostname()

RE: Status of hstrerror() and h_errno in cygwin and one more important question

On 09 April 2007 22:35, Eric Lilja wrote: > I'm developing a very simple IRC bot (written in C++) with a gui using > the cygwin tools. > Also, and more importantly, I'm having a weird core dump in my > application. The program is very simple, when launched you can connect > to an irc server (whic

RE: Status of gcc 3.4.4-2

On 14 September 2006 06:23, Greg Couch wrote: > I'm actually hoping to skip 3.4.4-2 and get gcc 3.4.6 or 4.1.1. When I > compile my application with 3.4.4, I'm getting an "internal compiler > error" that I don't get with 3.4.6 on Linux. > > Any news about a newer version of gcc for cygwin? O

Re: Status of gcc 3.4.4-2

I'm actually hoping to skip 3.4.4-2 and get gcc 3.4.6 or 4.1.1. When I compile my application with 3.4.4, I'm getting an "internal compiler error" that I don't get with 3.4.6 on Linux. Any news about a newer version of gcc for cygwin? Greg Couch -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwi

Re: status of bash-3.0-12

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes on 12/15/2005 1:43 AM: >>My plan for bash-3.0-12 and beyond is to only upgrade /bin/sh to the >>newest bash version if /bin/sh has an older timestamp than /bin/bash, >>and is not ksh or zsh. > > I see about a week a

Re: Status of nl_langinfo and CODESET

On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 09:10:10PM +0100, Colin JN Breame wrote: >I've been investigating the dreaded "Can't recode string" error in >subversion. This error occurs when a string contains characters that >cannot be converted into the equivalent characters in the users locale. > >It seems that nl_

Re: status of id-utils on cygwin

On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 04:18:24AM -0600, Manik, Raina (IE10) wrote: >Is id-utils about to become a package with cygwin in the new releases >in the near future ? No. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Document

RE: Status of GCC 3.1 port?

I have built gcc 3.1 snapshot of today and it works fine... Stephano Mariani > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf > Of Dylan Cuthbert > Sent: Sunday, 10 March 2002 2:34 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Stat

Re: Status of GCC 3.1 port?

Its pretty easy to grab the sources and recompile it for yourself, just follow the directions on the gcc homepage. I had some problems with the fastjar directory, whatever that is, but if you just specify gcc to be compiled when you issue the make command I think it will skip over that directory.

Re: status gcc-3

On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 01:57:14PM +0300, Ildar Mulyukov wrote: > Hello, cygwin hackers! >Would you please inform me about gcc-3.x status regarding to Cygwin >project? I mean > >* status of gcc-3 ability at cygwin platform > (I suggest 99%; when I tried it out 2month ago every

Re: STATUS+AF8-ACCESS+AF8-VIOLATION Exception

Thanks Egor. Amos - Original Message - From: "egor duda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Amos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 3:17 PM Subject: Re: STATUS+AF8-ACCESS+AF8-VIOLATION Exception > Hi! &g

Re: STATUS+AF8-ACCESS+AF8-VIOLATION Exception

Hi! Thursday, 24 January, 2002 Amos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A> Any simple c program that uses a string function crashes with the A> STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION exception. A> #include A> main() A> {char *abc = "a b c"; A> strcpy(abc, "hello"); A> printf("%s\n", abc); A> } your program

Re: status access violation

On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 01:15:37PM +0100, Enrico Bernardini wrote: >My program has a strange behavior. It is like this example: >main >{ >... >setuid(client_uid); >... > >switch(fork()) >case default: >... >break; > >case 0: /* child */ >... >execle(...); >break; >} > >well, it works but when I re