On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 13:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> One of the people here is trying to install Cygwin for the first time
> ever on his Win2k PC. We update a mirrored copy of Cygwin nightly, and
> install from that on our local network.
>
> The problem he's having is that when getting to the
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 13:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> One of the people here is trying to install Cygwin for the first time
> ever on his Win2k PC. We update a mirrored copy of Cygwin nightly, and
> install from that on our local network.
>
> The problem he's having is that when getting to the
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 13:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> One of the people here is trying to install Cygwin for the first time
> ever on his Win2k PC. We update a mirrored copy of Cygwin nightly, and
> install from that on our local network.
>
> The problem he's having is that when getting to the
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 16:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'd still be interested to know what setup is doing at that point. It
> might give us a clue as to why setup's performance varies across such a
> wide range. (If Cygwin was already installed, could we strace
> setup.exe?)
no - it's not a
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 16:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'd still be interested to know what setup is doing at that point. It
> might give us a clue as to why setup's performance varies across such a
> wide range. (If Cygwin was already installed, could we strace
> setup.exe?)
no - it's not a
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 16:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'd still be interested to know what setup is doing at that point. It
> might give us a clue as to why setup's performance varies across such a
> wide range. (If Cygwin was already installed, could we strace
> setup.exe?)
no - it's not a
6 matches
Mail list logo
