Re: Problem compiling Numeric-23.0 with latest python-2.2.2-6

2003-03-12 Thread Jason Tishler
Volker, On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 01:29:40AM +0100, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: > > "Jason" == Jason Tishler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jason> Sorry, until others have this problem, you will have to > Jason> debug this yourself. > > OK I found it. > > >From /lib/python2.2/distutils/comma

Re: Problem compiling Numeric-23.0 with latest python-2.2.2-6

2003-03-10 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
> "Jason" == Jason Tishler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jason> Volker, Jason> On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 03:15:55PM +0100, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: >> Yes there is one on SF. Jason> I just tried Numeric-23.0 -- still works for me. >> Do you know where the -L stuff is generated

Re: Problem compiling Numeric-23.0 with latest python-2.2.2-6

2003-03-10 Thread Jason Tishler
Volker, On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 03:15:55PM +0100, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: > Yes there is one on SF. I just tried Numeric-23.0 -- still works for me. > Do you know where the -L stuff is generated IIRC, distutils "greps" this out of /usr/lib/python2.2/config/Makefile. However, I haven't been in th

Re: Problem compiling Numeric-23.0 with latest python-2.2.2-6

2003-03-09 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
> "Jason" == Jason Tishler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jason> IMO, this post is more appropriate for cygwin@ than [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK Jason> On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 12:52:58PM +0100, Volker Zell wrote: >> I just tried compiling Numeric-23.0 with latest python-2.2.2-6 and got

Re: Problem compiling Numeric-23.0 with latest python-2.2.2-6

2003-03-09 Thread Jason Tishler
IMO, this post is more appropriate for cygwin@ than [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 12:52:58PM +0100, Volker Zell wrote: > I just tried compiling Numeric-23.0 with latest python-2.2.2-6 and got > the following error: SF is down right now. Is there really a Numeric-23.0? I could only