On Aug 22 13:00, Shankar Unni wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> >use POSIX permissions with POSIX permission rules -> ntsec,
> > use Windows permissions with Windows permission rules -> nontsec
>
> Err, isn't that sort of a backwards terminology? When I see the word
> "ntsec", I read it as "
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
use POSIX permissions with POSIX permission rules -> ntsec,
> use Windows permissions with Windows permission rules -> nontsec
Err, isn't that sort of a backwards terminology? When I see the word
"ntsec", I read it as "use NT SECurity", vs. "NO NT SECurity" (i.e.
some
On Aug 19 16:58, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Christopher Benson-Manica wrote:
>
> > > chmod, and other POSIX programs know nothing about ACLs (which is where
> > > inheritance is specified). You should, however, be able to use
> > > "getfacl/setfacl" to do what you want.
> >
>
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Christopher Benson-Manica wrote:
> > chmod, and other POSIX programs know nothing about ACLs (which is where
> > inheritance is specified). You should, however, be able to use
> > "getfacl/setfacl" to do what you want.
>
> Hm... It seems that (get|set)facl do allow detailed
> chmod, and other POSIX programs know nothing about ACLs (which is where
> inheritance is specified). You should, however, be able to use
> "getfacl/setfacl" to do what you want.
Hm... It seems that (get|set)facl do allow detailed permissions to be
set, but what I really need is the inherited
p
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Christopher Benson-Manica wrote:
> So I'm using smbntsec as the security setting, and it worked like a
> charm. I've still got a problem, though - the files I create are
> losing the "inherit permissions" attribute, and I don't know how to
> get that attribute back without us
6 matches
Mail list logo
