Re: Patch for building libcrypt.a as a DLL

2003-10-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 09:31:44PM +0200, Ralf Habacker wrote: > BTW: There is another lib, libutil.a in the inetutils package, which causes > same libtool problems Please don't use libutil.a anymore. All functionality intentionally exported from libutil.a is now exported genuinely by the Cygwin

Re: Patch for building libcrypt.a as a DLL

2003-10-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:54:35PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > >Sure, thanks for the patch. I've changed the Makefile a bit, using > >`install -d' instead of the `if [ -d ...' expressions and adding the > >installation of a crypt.README file. > > > >Just one questio

Re: Patch for building libcrypt.a as a DLL

2003-10-19 Thread Charles Wilson
Corinna Vinschen wrote: Sure, thanks for the patch. I've changed the Makefile a bit, using `install -d' instead of the `if [ -d ...' expressions and adding the installation of a crypt.README file. Just one question: Does an additional libcrypt.la file make sense? Meh. It might, but simply provid

Re: Patch for building libcrypt.a as a DLL

2003-10-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 05:21:27PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > This should make life a little simpler for those apps that use libtool > to build DLLs and depend on libcrypt -- since libtool tries very hard to > ensure that all dependencies of a DLL are themselves DLLs. > > Corinna, please con