RE: Oh dear, pthreads and stdio still not mt-safe :-(

> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Pfaff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 13 January 2004 20:01 > To: Dave Korn > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Oh dear, pthreads and stdio still not mt-safe :-( > > Dave Korn wrote: > > Ah, thanks for the info

Re: Oh dear, pthreads and stdio still not mt-safe :-(

Dave Korn wrote: Ah, thanks for the info. I noticed that a few people have been working on it lately, including yourself and Thomas Pfaff, so I was hoping that any known problems or workrounds might be fresh in people's minds. May I ask if whoever last was maintainer left any notes or docs abou

RE: Oh dear, pthreads and stdio still not mt-safe :-(

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor > > We are missing a pthreads maintainer at the moment so it > isn't likely that this will be fixed anytime soon. > > FYI, > cgf Ah, thanks for the info. I noticed that a fe

Re: Oh dear, pthreads and stdio still not mt-safe :-(

On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 05:47:31PM -, Dave Korn wrote: >Hi everyone (and Arash in particular!), > >Re: my earlier message [at >http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2004-01/msg00072.html ] > > Well, I thought the latest snapshot had solved my problem with stdio >getting messed up by threads, but