Re: Proposed Mailing List Page Reorg (was: RE: No stderr output)

2002-01-13 Thread Soren Andersen
On 10 Jan 2002 at 20:55, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: [cgf wrote:] > > If this doesn't do it, then I think the best plan is to find help from > > another mailing list. Basic shell questions are not really appropriate > > here -- especially given the recent volume we've been experiencing. > I've be

Re: Proposed Mailing List Page Reorg (was: RE: No stderr output)

2002-01-11 Thread Robert Collins
- Original Message - From: "Joshua Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > and added the guide. This was before the setup.exe > changes that made a minimal install easy. I've > stopped updating Cygwin-Lite but I think the webpage > is useful: Yes!, thank you, thank you! I was starting to wonde

Re: Proposed Mailing List Page Reorg (was: RE: No stderr output)

2002-01-11 Thread Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
At 09:55 PM 1/10/2002, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf > > Of Christopher Faylor > > > >[snip] > > > >For Bourne style shells I use > > > > > >runme > filename 2>&1 > > > > > >This redirects stdout first and t

Proposed Mailing List Page Reorg (was: RE: No stderr output)

2002-01-11 Thread Joshua Franklin
A while ago I was helping students that were new to bash and UNIX and I wrote a little guide in HTML. Late I put together "Cygwin-Lite" (Cygwin on a floppy) and added the guide. This was before the setup.exe changes that made a minimal install easy. I've stopped updating Cygwin-Lite but I think

Re: Proposed Mailing List Page Reorg (was: RE: No stderr output)

2002-01-10 Thread Robert Collins
=== - Original Message - From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Comments? Questions other than "what are you smoking"? ;-) How long have you been somking it :}-. Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.co

Proposed Mailing List Page Reorg (was: RE: No stderr output)

2002-01-10 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf > Of Christopher Faylor > [snip] > >For Bourne style shells I use > > > >runme > filename 2>&1 > > > >This redirects stdout first and then stderr to whereever stdout is > >pointing. > > If this doesn't do

Re: No stderr output

2002-01-10 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 11:06:57PM +, Don Sharp wrote: >William S Fulton wrote: >> Anything sent to stderr does not appear on the terminal. It seems to >> disappear into a black hole. I think it started when I was attempting to >> redirect stdout and stderr into the same file in the same order

Re: No stderr output

2002-01-10 Thread Don Sharp
William S Fulton wrote: > > Anything sent to stderr does not appear on the terminal. It seems to > disappear into a black hole. I think it started when I was attempting to > redirect stdout and stderr into the same file in the same order it appears > on the console using something like > runme

Re: No stderr output

2002-01-10 Thread Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
At 05:07 PM 1/10/2002, William S Fulton wrote: >Anything sent to stderr does not appear on the terminal. It seems to >disappear into a black hole. I think it started when I was attempting to >redirect stdout and stderr into the same file in the same order it appears >on the console using something