Re: GOLD STAR (was Re: [PATCH] 'rebase' uninitialised variable)

2013-12-06 Thread Andrew Schulman
> I can't respond to David Stacey's original mail but I think he should > get a gold star for persevering and figuring this out: > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-11/msg00484.html Awarded: http://cygwin.com/goldstars/#DSt -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ:

Re: GOLD STAR (was Re: [PATCH] 'rebase' uninitialised variable)

2013-12-03 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Dec 3 11:10, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 05:05:07PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >On Dec 3 10:43, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> I can't respond to David Stacey's original mail but I think he should > >> get a gold star for persevering and figuring this out: > >> >

Re: GOLD STAR (was Re: [PATCH] 'rebase' uninitialised variable)

2013-12-03 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 05:05:07PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Dec 3 10:43, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> I can't respond to David Stacey's original mail but I think he should >> get a gold star for persevering and figuring this out: >> >> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-11/msg00484.html >

Re: GOLD STAR (was Re: [PATCH] 'rebase' uninitialised variable)

2013-12-03 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Dec 3 10:43, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I can't respond to David Stacey's original mail but I think he should > get a gold star for persevering and figuring this out: > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-11/msg00484.html I agree. I should have thought about this myself. Corinna -- Corin