Re: GIT (was: Coverity Scan)

2014-04-25 Thread Duncan Roe
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 08:42:34AM +0800, JonY wrote: > On 4/26/2014 07:27, Andrey Repin wrote: > > This is exactly what makes me dislike it strongly. This, and idiotic model > > of > > copying whole repository to my machine, when I only want to glance at the > > source code, and find the culprit

Re: GIT (was: Coverity Scan)

2014-04-25 Thread JonY
On 4/26/2014 07:27, Andrey Repin wrote: > This is exactly what makes me dislike it strongly. This, and idiotic model of > copying whole repository to my machine, when I only want to glance at the > source code, and find the culprit of my current issues. > I've spent 3 hours downloading a 200Mb repo

Re: GIT (was: Coverity Scan)

2014-04-25 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, Jim Garrison! >> -Original Message- >> Corinna Vinschen >> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 6:33 AM >> > >> There have been a few hints on this list about a possible move >> > >> from CVS to git. If such a move were on the cards then that should >> > >> probably happen first - I

Re: GIT (was: Coverity Scan)

2014-04-25 Thread Reini Urban
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Apr 25 15:24, Jim Garrison wrote: >> > Corinna Vinschen >> > > >Yeah, I'm n ot exactly looking forward to it since I'm very familiar >> > > >with CVS or SVN, but have nothing but trouble with git. But since >> > > >everybody else is so

Re: GIT (was: Coverity Scan)

2014-04-25 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 25 15:24, Jim Garrison wrote: > > Corinna Vinschen > > > >Yeah, I'm n ot exactly looking forward to it since I'm very familiar > > > >with CVS or SVN, but have nothing but trouble with git. But since > > > >everybody else is so very happy with git, I guess I'll have to adapt. > > > >Teeth-g