On 5/5/2016 4:26 PM, Warren Young wrote:
On May 5, 2016, at 11:59 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
Ismail's suggestion did indeed produce deterministic builds in my setup. I
built a large project with about 150 executables, changed a few source files,
removed the build directory, rebuilt, and found tha
On May 5, 2016, at 11:59 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
>
> Ismail's suggestion did indeed produce deterministic builds in my setup. I
> built a large project with about 150 executables, changed a few source files,
> removed the build directory, rebuilt, and found that only the (expected) few
> executa
On 5/4/2016 1:39 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 5/4/2016 1:21 PM, Ismail Donmez wrote:
You can easily disable this feature:
latte ~ > gcc -Wl,--no-insert-timestamp hello.c
latte ~ > objdump -p a.exe | grep Time/Date
Time/Date Thu Jan 1 03:31:53 1970
latte ~ > gcc -Wl,--no-insert-timesta
Greetings, Ken Brown!
> Is it possible to build an executable on Cygwin so that subsequent
> builds (with no change in source) produce identical results?
General answer is "no". It is possible to build a consistent object binary,
but executable linked from it will be different on different syste
On 5/4/2016 1:21 PM, Ismail Donmez wrote:
You can easily disable this feature:
latte ~ > gcc -Wl,--no-insert-timestamp hello.c
latte ~ > objdump -p a.exe | grep Time/Date
Time/Date Thu Jan 1 03:31:53 1970
latte ~ > gcc -Wl,--no-insert-timestamp hello.c
latte ~ > objdump -p a.exe |
Hi,
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
> Is it possible to build an executable on Cygwin so that subsequent builds
> (with no change in source) produce identical results? Currently, the
> timestamp embedded in executables prevents this. (I don't know if that's
> the only obstacle.
Ken Brown writes:
> Is it possible to build an executable on Cygwin so that subsequent
> builds (with no change in source) produce identical results?
> Currently, the timestamp embedded in executables prevents this. (I
> don't know if that's the only obstacle.)
I think the basic problems and solu
On 2016-05-04 13:38, Ken Brown wrote:
> Is it possible to build an executable on Cygwin so that subsequent
> builds (with no change in source) produce identical results? Currently,
> the timestamp embedded in executables prevents this. (I don't know if
> that's the only obstacle.)
'-fno-guess
8 matches
Mail list logo
