On Aug 21 08:50, Jason Curl wrote:
> Open Group Posix.1c-2004 mentions only a "signal stack" doesn't need to be
> copied for XSI.
>
> Linux & FreeBSD 7.0 work OK. QNX641 returns ENOSYS if it even sniffs a thread
> call. I haven't tested Solaris Sparc.
>
> Which standard is Cygwin "closest" to,
Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
> On Aug 15 14:53, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 07:42:01PM +0200, Jason Curl wrote:
> > >Is it allowed to issue the fork() system call while not in the main
> > >thread? When I read the OpenGroup specifications I don't seem to find
>
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:05:52AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Aug 15 14:53, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 07:42:01PM +0200, Jason Curl wrote:
>> >Is it allowed to issue the fork() system call while not in the main
>> >thread? When I read the OpenGroup specifications
On Aug 15 14:53, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 07:42:01PM +0200, Jason Curl wrote:
> >Is it allowed to issue the fork() system call while not in the main
> >thread? When I read the OpenGroup specifications I don't seem to find
> >anything against allowing this.
> >
> >In par
On 15/08/2010 20:53, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 07:42:01PM +0200, Jason Curl wrote:
In particular, if I create a thread, then issue a fork(), data that
exists on the stack is corrupted after the fork() is in the child. Using
data on the heap doesn't show any issues (and is
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 07:42:01PM +0200, Jason Curl wrote:
>Is it allowed to issue the fork() system call while not in the main
>thread? When I read the OpenGroup specifications I don't seem to find
>anything against allowing this.
>
>In particular, if I create a thread, then issue a fork(), dat
6 matches
Mail list logo
