On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 06:08:33PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 11:06:49AM -0500, Gary R Van Sickle wrote:
>> XPPro, NTFS. Builds working GCC cross compiler and binutils just fine,
>> which covers a lot of intermediate territory. Autoconf/Automake/Perl still
>> work. I
Elfyn McBratney wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Gary R Van Sickle wrote:
XPPro, NTFS. Builds working GCC cross compiler and binutils just fine,
which covers a lot of intermediate territory. Autoconf/Automake/Perl still
work. I don't know if the tools thus built use 64-bit file APIs, since I
don't
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 11:06:49AM -0500, Gary R Van Sickle wrote:
> XPPro, NTFS. Builds working GCC cross compiler and binutils just fine,
> which covers a lot of intermediate territory. Autoconf/Automake/Perl still
> work. I don't know if the tools thus built use 64-bit file APIs, since I
> do
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Gary R Van Sickle wrote:
> XPPro, NTFS. Builds working GCC cross compiler and binutils just fine,
> which covers a lot of intermediate territory. Autoconf/Automake/Perl still
> work. I don't know if the tools thus built use 64-bit file APIs, since I
> don't have any source
4 matches
Mail list logo