Rares Boian wrote:
However, "ls -lh" seems to be able to deal with that number and
reports it correctly as 16-exabytes.
^
What?!? 16 exabytes?! That's what? 16 * 10^18? Are you joking? All the
disks on earth wouldn't add up to that capacity. (Well, maybe they would
in th
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 12:12:54AM -0500, Rares Boian wrote:
>"ls -l" reports a huge number as file size for files larger than 2GB.
Correct. Known problem.
Searching the mailing list archives for "2GB" would have shown that
pretty quickly.
--
Please do not send me personal email with cygwin ques
2 matches
Mail list logo
