Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 04:34:13AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
there is dbmail, but it doesn't work with Windows (or Cygwin) yet.
Don't see how dbmail will help you with spam.
I want to store my mail in a database. My email client should only
need to display the mail,
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 04:34:13AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>Hello Andrew,
>
>>> there is dbmail, but it doesn't work with Windows (or Cygwin) yet.
>
>> Don't see how dbmail will help you with spam.
>
>I want to store my mail in a database. My email client should only
>need to display the mai
Hello Andrew,
>> there is dbmail, but it doesn't work with Windows (or Cygwin) yet.
> Don't see how dbmail will help you with spam.
I want to store my mail in a database. My email client should only
need to display the mail, not working as a database server. I tried
again to get dbmail up and
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Hello Andrew,
You can filter about hundred mails a day, maybe 250, but since I'm
getting 1000 mails a day and more my machine is quite busy with
filtering.
Hell I'm filtering 1000 - 1500 per day and putting them into an SQL
database as well as bouncing most of them on my l
"Gerrit P. Haase" wrote:
> >> You can filter about hundred mails a day, maybe 250, but since I'm
> >> getting 1000 mails a day and more my machine is quite busy with
> >> filtering.
>
> > Hell I'm filtering 1000 - 1500 per day and putting them into an SQL
> > database as well as bouncing most of
Hello Andrew,
>> You can filter about hundred mails a day, maybe 250, but since I'm
>> getting 1000 mails a day and more my machine is quite busy with
>> filtering.
> Hell I'm filtering 1000 - 1500 per day and putting them into an SQL
> database as well as bouncing most of them on my little 3
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Hallo Richard,
Am Donnerstag, 23. September 2004 um 18:12 schriebst du:
To filter out spam at the client side is not possible, I would need
another PC just to filter my emails...
I disagree. SpamBayes is working very well for me (as an Outlook
plugin; SpamBayes also integra
Hello Reini,
> PCYMTNQREAIYR does not help for me, since I'm FAQ author and perl cpan
> author. this is a bad combination.
I'm Cygwin package maintainer, this is a bad combi too.
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http:
Hallo Richard,
Am Donnerstag, 23. September 2004 um 18:12 schriebst du:
>> To filter out spam at the client side is not possible, I would need
>> another PC just to filter my emails...
> I disagree. SpamBayes is working very well for me (as an Outlook
> plugin; SpamBayes also integrates with p
Gerrit P. Haase schrieb:
Spamming is more or less an industry now, ...
All what clients can do about spam is to completely ignore all emails
which are not from known senders, so you get just some crap through
the lists, even no personal replies to some list postings if you have
the sender not white
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Hughes, Bill wrote:
> [various recipes for spammer treatment snipped]
>
> Next job is to work out how to use fetchmail+procmail+postfix+... to help me
> not to have to play whack a mole quite so much.
>
> I'm grateful to the this list (can't remember who in particular) for tel
Dave Korn wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Gerrit P. Haase
>> Sent: 23 September 2004 17:09
>
>> We really need some *global* rules, e.g. SPF and some other, similar
>> method, to get 99% of spamservers out of the internet.
>>
>
>
> Nahh. What we really
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Gerrit P. Haase
> > Sent: 23 September 2004 17:09
>
> > We really need some *global* rules, e.g. SPF and some other, similar
> > method, to get 99% of spamservers out of the internet.
>
> Nah
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> To filter out spam at the client side is not possible...
Well, aside from an occasional simpleton who gets duped into replying to a
spam message, the main danger of spam is the mass e-mailing aspect that
ties up computer and network resources. So I g
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Gerrit P. Haase
> Sent: 23 September 2004 17:09
> We really need some *global* rules, e.g. SPF and some other, similar
> method, to get 99% of spamservers out of the internet.
>
Nahh. What we really need are not rules; what we ne
> To filter out spam at the client side is not possible, I would need
> another PC just to filter my emails...
I disagree. SpamBayes is working very well for me (as an Outlook
plugin; SpamBayes also integrates with procmail and about a million
other things).
http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/
Hello Igor,
> Spamming is more or less an industry now, ...
All what clients can do about spam is to completely ignore all emails
which are not from known senders, so you get just some crap through
the lists, even no personal replies to some list postings if you have
the sender not whitelisted, s
17 matches
Mail list logo
