Eric Blake wrote:
On 09/22/2010 03:02 PM, Daniel Barclay wrote:
...
Again, why does Cygwin's (virtual) file system _not_ include those
devices (when listing /dev)? (Why doesn't it do it more like Linux's
/proc, etc., which gives a consistent view and which tells you what's
available without you
On 09/22/2010 03:02 PM, Daniel Barclay wrote:
They are implemented in a virtual file system. It is not necessary that
there be placeholders in the file system for them to work.
But if they were emulated/simulated _consistently_, one could see which
devices were available by simply listing /dev
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
On 9/22/2010 1:29 PM, Daniel Barclay wrote:
Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote:
...
To go there directly:
http://www.cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-specialnames.html#pathnames-posixdevices
Regarding where that page says:
These devices cannot be seen with the
On 9/22/2010 1:29 PM, Daniel Barclay wrote:
Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote:
...
To go there directly:
http://www.cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-specialnames.html#pathnames-posixdevices
Regarding where that page says:
These devices cannot be seen with the command ls /dev/ ...
I've w
Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote:
...
To go there directly:
http://www.cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-specialnames.html#pathnames-posixdevices
Regarding where that page says:
These devices cannot be seen with the command ls /dev/ ...
I've wondered about that--why aren't those specia
DEWI - N. Zacharias sent the following at Wednesday, September 22, 2010 11:36 AM
>> > as mentinoned in
>> > http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-cygwinenv.html i have set CGWIN to
>> > tty .
>> see POSIX name on
>> http://www.cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-specialnames.htm
>This link do not work
6 matches
Mail list logo
