RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] notice of package removal: gcc2-2.95-*

2003-10-06 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 12:52:44PM -0400, Larry Hall wrote: > > >At 01:13 AM 10/5/2003, Christopher Faylor you wrote: > > > > > > > > >>Oh, and I probably have to say that the gcc 3.3.1 package will still be > > >>available. > > > > > >Yes but will

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] notice of package removal: gcc2-2.95-*

2003-10-05 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 12:52:44PM -0400, Larry Hall wrote: > >At 01:13 AM 10/5/2003, Christopher Faylor you wrote: > > > > > >>Oh, and I probably have to say that the gcc 3.3.1 package will still be > >>available. > > > >Yes but will it work with B20??? ;-) > > I don't think it's even an issue.

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] notice of package removal: gcc2-2.95-*

2003-10-05 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 12:52:44PM -0400, Larry Hall wrote: >At 01:13 AM 10/5/2003, Christopher Faylor you wrote: > > >>Oh, and I probably have to say that the gcc 3.3.1 package will still be >>available. > >Yes but will it work with B20??? ;-) I don't think it's even an issue. B20 compiles files

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] notice of package removal: gcc2-2.95-*

2003-10-05 Thread Larry Hall
At 01:13 AM 10/5/2003, Christopher Faylor you wrote: >Oh, and I probably have to say that the gcc 3.3.1 package will still be >available. Yes but will it work with B20??? ;-) -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779