Rico,
Did you make any progress on this effort or not? I never saw any further
discussion on this, but having nfs on cygwin would definitely be
desirable. Also, has anyone else done any work on this? All I can seem
to find is a *very* old port that won't work AFAIK...
Thanks,
Nicholas
__
> You're talking about the "Users may copy or modify Sun RPC without charge,
> but are not authorized to license or distribute it to anyone else except
> as part of a product or program developed by the user." part, right?
>
> Do we actually need an exemption? Sun RPC is even part of glibc.
>
>
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 04:23:24PM +0800, Rico Juinio wrote:
> Corinna,
>
> I am trying to get a SUNRPC package for cygwin together. However when I
> read the license packaged with the original sources, it seems I cannot
> distribute it. I tried to e-mail to Sun ([EMAIL PROTECTED] as named in t
unknown). Do
you or anyone else know of anyone who can get me in touch with Sun about
this issue?
- Original Message -
From: "Corinna Vinschen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 6:22 PM
Subject: Re: RPC and NFS port for cygwin
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 05:01:13PM +0800, Rico Juinio wrote:
> I have search high and low for a port of ONC/SUN RPC to cygwin. Alas I can
> find only the ONCRPC port for Windows NT that does not even support
> compiling using gcc. So I ported SUNRPC 4.0. Its seems to be working
> however would
I have search high and low for a port of ONC/SUN RPC to cygwin. Alas I can
find only the ONCRPC port for Windows NT that does not even support
compiling using gcc. So I ported SUNRPC 4.0. Its seems to be working
however would anybody be interested in polishing this effort? or maybe
there is al
6 matches
Mail list logo
