Donald Wallace Rouse II wrote:
>
> This patch is not in the current release (1.5.11-1).
> I can't compile it myself, because ./config fails (because it uses pipes).
> Can someone give me some kind of timeframe when the next version will be released
> (with this patch in it)?
http://cygwin.com/sn
This patch is not in the current release (1.5.11-1).
I can't compile it myself, because ./config fails (because it uses pipes).
Can someone give me some kind of timeframe when the next version will be released
(with this patch in it)?
Thanks.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsu
> On Sep 9 21:24, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > > : nudge our legal department again.
> > > >
> > > > I'll be waiting. (This will give me more time to test
> > > readdir_r, once
> > > > I decide how to keep accesses separate.)
> > >
> > > Sic.
> >
> > I think you mean "Ditto" ther
On Sep 9 21:24, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> [snip]
> > > : nudge our legal department again.
> > >
> > > I'll be waiting. (This will give me more time to test
> > readdir_r, once
> > > I decide how to keep accesses separate.)
> >
> > Sic.
>
> I think you mean "Ditto" there Corinna.
No, I me
[snip]
> > : nudge our legal department again.
> >
> > I'll be waiting. (This will give me more time to test
> readdir_r, once
> > I decide how to keep accesses separate.)
>
> Sic.
I think you mean "Ditto" there Corinna. "Sic" is used when you're quoting
something that's erroneous or misspell
This patch looks right to me.
create_selectable_pipe is the only place where CreateNamedPipe is used,
so it should completely fix the problem.
Sorry I missed this ... I don't have a win95 system to use for testing.
--
Bob
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Proble
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 03:00:53AM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
>The fact that INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE != NULL, made me think NULL might
>be a valid handle value elsewhere.
NULL is never a valid handle.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: ht
On Sep 9 11:02, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Sep 9 03:00, Bas van Gompel wrote:
> > Possibly. However MS might also make NULL be an alias to NUL in the
> > future, or just treat NULL like any other handle.
>
> Very unlikely. NULL and INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE are returned randomly in the
> Win32 API
On Sep 9 03:00, Bas van Gompel wrote:
> Possibly. However MS might also make NULL be an alias to NUL in the
> future, or just treat NULL like any other handle.
Very unlikely. NULL and INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE are returned randomly in the
Win32 API to indicate an invalid handle.
> : nudge our legal
Op Wed, 8 Sep 2004 12:06:57 +0200 schreef Corinna Vinschen
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: On Sep 8 01:55, Bas van Gompel wrote:
: > This fix trips on a bug in (my) windows 95 (OSR2):
: > It's CreateNamedPipe returns 0 instead of -1 (INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE),
: > causing all operations on pipes to fail.
:
On Sep 8 01:55, Bas van Gompel wrote:
> This fix trips on a bug in (my) windows 95 (OSR2):
> It's CreateNamedPipe returns 0 instead of -1 (INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE),
> causing all operations on pipes to fail.
> [...]
> A patch to work around this in cygwin could be: (WFM)
>
> Begin pipe-w95.diff
Op Wed, 8 Sep 2004 01:55:29 +0200 (MET DST) schreef ik
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...]
: ChangeLog-entry:
That was fu^Houled up. Let me try again.
2004-09-08 Bas van Gompel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* pipe.cc (create_selectable_pipe): Work around bug in windows 95
where CreateNamedPip
12 matches
Mail list logo
