Re: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues

On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 11:56:28PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: >Brian Dessent schrieb: >>Reini Urban wrote: >>>Ok. Just an additional entry in the "Product" list >>>at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/ >> >>Surely you mean and it >>looks like a few c

Re: whole Cygwin release/ distribution issues

Gerrit P. Haase schrieb: Hallo Reini, Am Montag, 4. Oktober 2004 um 21:06 schriebst du: * perl layout (better upgrade convenience) will be changed in the next update, I promise;) So we'll need another full recompile of all our extensions? :) No problem, if it stays then until perl6 or another xs A

Re: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues

Brian Dessent schrieb: Reini Urban wrote: Ok. Just an additional entry in the "Product" list at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/ Surely you mean and it looks like a few categories are already there. I don't think the Redhat project cares about ou

Re: whole Cygwin release/ distribution issues

Hallo Reini, Am Montag, 4. Oktober 2004 um 21:06 schriebst du: > Gerrit P. Haase schrieb: >>>gcc-core > 3.3.3 >>> needs libtool-devel-1.5.10 (still in test) for >>> libtoolized packages: .rdata bug >> >> Not a bug, a feature? > ?? I don't know if it is a bug or a feature, it may well be

Re: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues

Reini Urban wrote: > Ok. Just an additional entry in the "Product" list > at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/ Surely you mean and it looks like a few categories are already there. I don't think the Redhat project cares about our bugs. :-) Bri

Re: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues

On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: > Actually, I think that one of the 3+ developers even volunteered to > help maintain bugzilla when I mentioned this on cygwin-developers. I'm feeling rather +'ish today ;-). Well, the original offer and conditions still stand: "I volunteer to share

Re: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues

Christopher Faylor schrieb: On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 10:16:51PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: Ah, I see. You meant something different. Just a bugzilla or mantis "Know issues" site. A bugtracker. Couldn't ITP's be tracked also then? Hmm, I'll think of it. I'd need shell access to sourceware then. Y

RE: whole Cygwin release/ distribution issues

Reini Urban wrote: > Expected problems: > * freshly added gif support in libgd > * libungif pending and problematic X dependencies for libtool. > * sysbash package pending (to test service problems) > * ExplorerHere package pending (often requested feature) Eh? Just out of curiosity; is this any

Re: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues

On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 10:16:51PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: >Ah, I see. You meant something different. Just a bugzilla or mantis >"Know issues" site. A bugtracker. Couldn't ITP's be tracked also >then? > >Hmm, I'll think of it. I'd need shell access to sourceware then. You wouldn't need shel

Re: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues

Christopher Faylor schrieb: On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 09:11:15PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: Christopher Faylor schrieb: Would you like to volunteer to maintain a "known issues" type of list which could be sent here periodically? Taking over from Igor? Did Igor volunteer somewhere? I did an archive se

Re: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues

On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 09:11:15PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: >Christopher Faylor schrieb: >>Reini, >>Would you like to volunteer to maintain a "known issues" type of list >>which could be sent here periodically? > >Taking over from Igor? Did Igor volunteer somewhere? I did an archive search and o

Re: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues

Christopher Faylor schrieb: Reini, Would you like to volunteer to maintain a "known issues" type of list which could be sent here periodically? Taking over from Igor? Sorry, not enough time right now, maybe later. When time permits I can send reminders. I already sent a private reminder to busy Ja

Re: whole Cygwin release/ distribution issues

Gerrit P. Haase schrieb: gcc-core > 3.3.3 needs libtool-devel-1.5.10 (still in test) for libtoolized packages: .rdata bug Not a bug, a feature? ?? same as the new libtool strictness which we don't quite like. (pass_all) old-style dlltool/dllwrap works just fine for me. postgreql-7.4.5 pgper

Re: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues (need new squid maintainer)

On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 07:28:05PM +0200, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: >squid needs a recompile: > > o http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2003-10/msg00554.html Actually, the issue is that we need a squid maintainer, AFAIK. Any volunteers? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscri

Re: whole Cygwin release/ distribution issues

> Reini Urban writes: > Maybe just start with issues for the binary packages: > Issues known to me so far: > ITP moratorium / SC (Steering Committee) idea? >http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-03/msg00036.html > coreutils >missing (required) >http://c

Re: whole cygwin release/ distribution issues

On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 06:45:20PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >Hello Reini, > >> gcc-core > 3.3.3 >>needs libtool-devel-1.5.10 (still in test) for >> libtoolized packages: .rdata bug > >Not a bug, a feature? > >> postgreql-7.4.5 >>pgperl fails > >Why? > > >> gnome2 >>stable? >>

Re: whole Cygwin release/ distribution issues

Hello Reini, > gcc-core > 3.3.3 >needs libtool-devel-1.5.10 (still in test) for > libtoolized packages: .rdata bug Not a bug, a feature? > postgreql-7.4.5 >pgperl fails Why? > gnome2 >stable? >some packages missing. far away from stable... > * perl layout (better upgra