Re: vim intellisense omnifunc

2006-10-27 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Oct 27 14:55, Dave Korn wrote: > On 27 October 2006 10:57, jt wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > "Intellisense" is one of the new very useful functionnalies in vim 7. > > Ouch. They really need to stop using a Microsoft trademark ASAP, before > they attract unwelcome (== lawyerly) attention...

Re: vim intellisense omnifunc

2006-10-27 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Oct 27 15:24, jt wrote: > >Vim is built with everything (--with-features=huge option). Omni > >completion > >is present. Did you set "filetype plugin on" in your .vimrc file? > > Yes I did. Now your question allowed me to narrow the issue: omnifunc > is indeed bundled but not the bindings to

RE: vim intellisense omnifunc

2006-10-27 Thread Dave Korn
On 27 October 2006 10:57, jt wrote: > Hello, > > "Intellisense" is one of the new very useful functionnalies in vim 7. Ouch. They really need to stop using a Microsoft trademark ASAP, before they attract unwelcome (== lawyerly) attention... cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witt

Re: vim intellisense omnifunc

2006-10-27 Thread jt
Vim is built with everything (--with-features=huge option). Omni completion is present. Did you set "filetype plugin on" in your .vimrc file? Yes I did. Now your question allowed me to narrow the issue: omnifunc is indeed bundled but not the bindings to python, ruby, tcl, ... as the output of

Re: vim intellisense omnifunc

2006-10-27 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Oct 27 11:57, jt wrote: > Hello, > > "Intellisense" is one of the new very useful functionnalies in vim 7. > It has to be enabled at compile time but it seems it is not in the > cygwin package. > > Could this be added soon (it is just some flags)? > Should I post to cygwin-app for this kind of