Re: setup.exe v.2.194.2.24 : tetex-beta-20001218-4

2002-04-12 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 08:09:31AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Either it's the new setup.exe v.2.194.2.24, or some glitch in the current >associated setup.ini (setup-timestamp: 1018593006), but every visit to >http://cygwin.com/setup.exe now results in a new installation of >tetex-beta-200012

RE: setup.exe v.2.194.2.24 : tetex-beta-20001218-4

2002-04-12 Thread fergus
Yes: I think it must be inconsistencies in the version numbering that have caused this. I found a recent setup.ini and compared it with the current version: Comparing files setup.ini and setup.old ** setup.ini setup-timestamp: 1018593006 setup-version: 2.194.2.24 ** setup.old setup-times

RE: setup.exe v.2.194.2.24 : tetex-beta-20001218-4

2002-04-12 Thread fergus
I know you (Robert) have not got a W98 machine. I've tried as much investigation at this end as I can. I've tried all combinations of v.22 / v.24 here, with / without using setup.ini at all, and editing setup.ini when used to refer to v.22 / v.24 accordingly. There is nothing obvious that I can se

RE: setup.exe v.2.194.2.24 : tetex-beta-20001218-4

2002-04-12 Thread fergus
Thanks for speedy response. Sorry for delay: it took ages to download tetex-beta again. The machines (two: identical repeated behaviour on both) are W98/SE. I use ftp://mirrors.rcn.net/ (tried others; none that I tried had yet been renewed). Here is setup.log 2002/04/12 08:15:39 Starting cygwi

RE: setup.exe v.2.194.2.24 : tetex-beta-20001218-4

2002-04-11 Thread Robert Collins
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 5:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: setup.exe v.2.194.2.24 : tetex-beta-20001218-4 > > > Either it's the new setup.exe v.2.194.2.24, or some glitch i