On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 09:54:39 -0500, Brian Ford wrote:
> BTW to the OP, why are you printing the address of the socket function
> out? I think you meant to print "s" instead of "socket"?
oops - you are right! i wanted to print the socket and not the
address of the socket() function!
;-) rainer
Warren Young wrote:
> As I see it, the purpose of SO_REUSEADDR is to allow a program to bind
> to a port that still has WAIT states on it. (FIN_WAIT_x, TIME_WAIT,
That, and the part about the uniqueness of local IP+port. Think
multihomed boxes that want to do ip-based virtual hosting.
It seems
Dave Korn wrote:
Because SO_REUSEADDR works _correctly_ on cygwin, perhaps?
Oh, I don't know about that.
As I see it, the purpose of SO_REUSEADDR is to allow a program to bind
to a port that still has WAIT states on it. (FIN_WAIT_x, TIME_WAIT,
etc...see netstat(1) and the Stevens TCP/IP books.
On Oct 5 09:54, Brian Ford wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
>
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Rainer Hochreiter
> > > Sent: 05 October 2004 15:29
> >
> > > running the program listed below with argument 'reuse' under
> > > cygwin and linux retur
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Rainer Hochreiter
> > Sent: 05 October 2004 15:29
>
> > running the program listed below with argument 'reuse' under
> > cygwin and linux returns different results!
> >
> > from my point of view
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Rainer Hochreiter
> Sent: 05 October 2004 15:29
> running the program listed below with argument 'reuse' under
> cygwin and linux returns different results!
>
> from my point of view, the linux result is quite what i
> expected, a b
6 matches
Mail list logo
