On Feb 15 01:13, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, Earnie Boyd!
>
> >>> The standard response to issues dealing with CRLF files is to point the
> >>> user to dos2unix and text mode mounts. This should be adequate without
> >>> the hidden behavior of sed/grep/awk and probably others.
> >>
> >> While
Greetings, Earnie Boyd!
>>> The standard response to issues dealing with CRLF files is to point the
>>> user to dos2unix and text mode mounts. This should be adequate without
>>> the hidden behavior of sed/grep/awk and probably others.
>>
>> While your reasoning is sound, I prefer them to behave t
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, Nellis, Kenneth!
>
>> The standard response to issues dealing with CRLF files is to point the
>> user to dos2unix and text mode mounts. This should be adequate without
>> the hidden behavior of sed/grep/awk and probably others.
>
> W
Greetings, Nellis, Kenneth!
> The standard response to issues dealing with CRLF files is to point the
> user to dos2unix and text mode mounts. This should be adequate without
> the hidden behavior of sed/grep/awk and probably others.
While your reasoning is sound, I prefer them to behave the way
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> If you meant that "rt" should be restricted to cygwin, that's also fine by
> me but in general I prefer feature tests to OS tests.
>
Then it becomes Cygwin's problem. I'm going to quote from
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/yeby3zcb
On 02/13/2012 08:42 PM, John Cowan wrote:
> By the way, I'm still opening the script file with "rt". I cannot think
> of any case when you would want to keep CRs there.
You wouldn't, but the point is that "rt" isn't defined on Posix systems.
If it happens to be the same as "r", good, but that i
Paolo Bonzini scripsit:
> By the way, I'm still opening the script file with "rt". I cannot think
> of any case when you would want to keep CRs there.
You wouldn't, but the point is that "rt" isn't defined on Posix systems.
If it happens to be the same as "r", good, but that isn't guaranteed.
On 02/13/2012 04:43 PM, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>
> By the way, I'm still opening the script file with "rt". I cannot think of
> any case when you would want to keep CRs there.
The case of
sed -e 's/something/nothing/g' myfile > myfile2
as it works in Cygwin today would mean that in the case of th
Earnie Boyd skrev 2012-02-13 16:43:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 02/13/2012 03:56 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>
As long as it's consistent with coreutils I'll certainly do the change.
>>>
>>> Thanks! Would you mind to CC the cygwin list when the next upstr
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 02/13/2012 03:56 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>
>> > As long as it's consistent with coreutils I'll certainly do the change.
>>
>> Thanks! Would you mind to CC the cygwin list when the next upstream
>> sed release is available?
>
>
> Sur
On Feb 13 16:22, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 02/13/2012 03:56 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> As long as it's consistent with coreutils I'll certainly do the change.
> >
> >Thanks! Would you mind to CC the cygwin list when the next upstream
> >sed release is available?
>
> Sure, it should be real
On 02/13/2012 03:56 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> As long as it's consistent with coreutils I'll certainly do the change.
Thanks! Would you mind to CC the cygwin list when the next upstream
sed release is available?
Sure, it should be real soon now since a new release has been long overdue.
[Sent again. I missed all the CC's in my previous reply. Sorry!]
On Feb 13 15:37, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 02/13/2012 03:12 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> >But fixing this should be done upstream, and not in cygwin.
>
> As long as it's consistent with coreutils I'll certainly do the change.
>
> Paol
On Feb 13 15:37, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 02/13/2012 03:12 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> >But fixing this should be done upstream, and not in cygwin.
>
> As long as it's consistent with coreutils I'll certainly do the change.
>
> Paolo
Thanks! Would you mind to CC the cygwin list when the next upstr
From: Earnie Boyd
>On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:>
>> That's why I wrote "on systems supporting this mode". Sed input is
>> text input in the first place. Therefore it's using textmode in the
>> first place. This is done so for a long time. If it's not what you
>> nee
On 02/13/2012 03:12 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
But fixing this should be done upstream, and not in cygwin.
As long as it's consistent with coreutils I'll certainly do the change.
Paolo
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documenta
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>
> Personally, I think it is a bug that upstream sed is using 't' in
> fopen() in the first place. Linux does NOT have an 'rt' mode for a
> reason: 't' is non-standard. On cygwin, the preference used in
> coreutils is that you get text mode by u
[adding bug-sed - see this thread in cygwin:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-02/msg00313.html]
On 02/11/2012 10:19 AM, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>>> By this I assume you to mean that the -b option opens the input file
>>> in binary mode. But the mount table the OP showed was already in
>>> binary mode.
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> That's why I wrote "on systems supporting this mode". Sed input is
> text input in the first place. Therefore it's using textmode in the
> first place. This is done so for a long time. If it's not what you
> need, there's a workaround,
On Feb 11 12:19, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Feb 10 14:44, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> > On Feb 10 08:02, Nellis, Kenneth wrote:
> >> >> Cygwin 'sed' seems to be stripping CRs from it
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 10 14:44, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> > On Feb 10 08:02, Nellis, Kenneth wrote:
>> >> Cygwin 'sed' seems to be stripping CRs from its input.
>> >> Linux sed doesn't do this. Exam
On Feb 10 14:44, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Feb 10 08:02, Nellis, Kenneth wrote:
> >> Cygwin 'sed' seems to be stripping CRs from its input.
> >> Linux sed doesn't do this. Example:
> >
> > Try the -b option.
>
> By this I assume you to me
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 10 08:02, Nellis, Kenneth wrote:
>> Cygwin 'sed' seems to be stripping CRs from its input.
>> Linux sed doesn't do this. Example:
>
> Try the -b option.
By this I assume you to mean that the -b option opens the input file
in binary
From: Corinna Vinschen
> On Feb 10 08:02, Nellis, Kenneth wrote:
> > Cygwin 'sed' seems to be stripping CRs from its input.
> > Linux sed doesn't do this. Example:
>
> Try the -b option.
Thanx for that. It's not a problem for me. I was just
reporting what looks like a Cygwin bug in case someo
On Feb 10 08:02, Nellis, Kenneth wrote:
> Cygwin 'sed' seems to be stripping CRs from its input.
> Linux sed doesn't do this. Example:
Try the -b option.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT
25 matches
Mail list logo
