--- "Paul D. DeRocco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, but I don't see it. I grepped all the gcc.info* files
> (indeed, all
> the *.info* files) for "specs", and read the matches in my editor.
> I found a
> bunch of mentions of the specs file, but no explanation of it.
>
To be quite honest,
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 08:21:27PM -0700, Michael A Chase wrote:
>On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 19:42:26 -0700 "Paul D. DeRocco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Sorry, but I don't see it. I grepped all the gcc.info* files (indeed,
>>all the *.info* files) for "specs", and read the matches in my editor.
>>I fo
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 19:42:26 -0700 "Paul D. DeRocco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, but I don't see it. I grepped all the gcc.info* files (indeed, all
> the *.info* files) for "specs", and read the matches in my editor. I found a
> bunch of mentions of the specs file, but no explanation of i
Sorry, but I don't see it. I grepped all the gcc.info* files (indeed, all
the *.info* files) for "specs", and read the matches in my editor. I found a
bunch of mentions of the specs file, but no explanation of it.
--
Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco
Paulmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 10:51:40AM -0700, Paul D. DeRocco wrote:
>The GNUPro Compiler Tools document mentions this file, and the
>gcc -dumpspecs option shows me what's in it. But where is its format
>documented? It's quite incomprehensible on its own.
In the gcc info file: "info gcc" .
cgf
--
U
5 matches
Mail list logo