On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 10:22:27AM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
>Igor,
>
>I think I understood your meaning, and I'm not in favor of placing any
>blame on the posters in this matter. As I mentioned in my earlier reply
>to David Sheridan, I assumed from the beginning that he had no control
>ove
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 09:29:10AM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
>Chris,
>
>Clearly this is now an open topic, so...
>
>Do you have a good way to do this? Igor's suggestion seems sound and
>easily implementable, but short of some kind of cooperation from the
>sender (in the form of a tag of some
Igor,
I think I understood your meaning, and I'm not in favor of placing any
blame on the posters in this matter. As I mentioned in my earlier reply
to David Sheridan, I assumed from the beginning that he had no control
over that disclaimer.
I was really curious if Chris has a way of detecting
Umm, Randall, I think you've missed the point of my post. I claimed that
people should not be blamed for something they have no control over, and
suggested a means of giving them the control. It *must* require
cooperation from the sender. Should they choose to ignore this control,
they'll deserv
Chris,
Clearly this is now an open topic, so...
Do you have a good way to do this? Igor's suggestion seems sound and
easily implementable, but short of some kind of cooperation from the
sender (in the form of a tag of some sort that marks the end of the
real content of their posting), it seems
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 07:45:10AM -0800, Michael A Chase wrote:
>On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:22:49 -0500 Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I am *so* tempted to add a filter to strip this crap out of email sent
>> here.
>
>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 09:05:27AM -, Sheridan, David wrote
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:22:49 -0500 Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am *so* tempted to add a filter to strip this crap out of email sent
> here.
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 09:05:27AM -, Sheridan, David wrote:
> >PLEASE READ: The information contained in this email is confident
I am *so* tempted to add a filter to strip this crap out of email sent here.
cgf
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 09:05:27AM -, Sheridan, David wrote:
>PLEASE READ: The information contained in this email is confidential
>and intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended
>recipi
> The rsync maintainers are quite considerate about this kind
> of thing. I
> think they would probably accept this kind of fix into the
> upstream sources.
Ok, thanks for the info. I've posted the query to the rsync list now.
-Dave
PLEASE READ: The information contained in this email is conf
Sheridan, David wrote:
> I'm using the cygwin version of rsync (2.5.5) and think I've found a
> bug which is harmless under unix but fatal to cygwin. The bug is also
> in the latest source version I could find (2.5.6).
>
> If I'm trying to take a file from (windows-style)
> \\share\directory\filena
10 matches
Mail list logo
