Re: cygrunsrv does not start sshd in 1 out of 40 installs

2002-02-13 Thread Lassi A. Tuura
> Now anybody some hints on what might happen there ? Anything I could try to > nail down the problem ? Try running cygrunsrv under strace (as the service). I did this once by hacking around the registry, it wasn't too hard, though I don't remember exactly what I did. Remember that strace takes

RE: cygrunsrv does not start sshd in 1 out of 40 installs

2002-02-13 Thread Hildenbrand, Patrick
89 St. Leon-Rot, Germany > T +49/6227/7-66410 > F +49/6227/7-66301 > E [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.saphosting.com -Original Message- From: Hildenbrand, Patrick Sent: Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2002 12:05 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: cygrunsrv does not s

RE: cygrunsrv does not start sshd in 1 out of 40 installs

2002-02-13 Thread Hildenbrand, Patrick
The problem is with cygrunsrv failing to initialize. Not even the first line of code is getting executed. Searching for StartServiceCtrlDispatcherA, I could find an other thread from last year, discussing the same problem: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2001-06/msg00099.html What I tried at the

RE: cygrunsrv does not start sshd in 1 out of 40 installs

2002-02-12 Thread Hildenbrand, Patrick
TECTED]] Sent: Dienstag, 12. Februar 2002 18:45 To: Hildenbrand, Patrick Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: cygrunsrv does not start sshd in 1 out of 40 installs > I did follow this discussion, but this one is totally unrelated as the > startup fails every time using cygrunsrv a

Re: cygrunsrv does not start sshd in 1 out of 40 installs

2002-02-12 Thread Lassi A. Tuura
> I did follow this discussion, but this one is totally unrelated as the > startup fails every time using cygrunsrv and works ok every time using > invoker AND because sshd even never gets started. sshd never gets started, or never executes? IIRC "service starts" means that it does something mag

RE: cygrunsrv does not start sshd in 1 out of 40 installs

2002-02-12 Thread Hildenbrand, Patrick
t: Dienstag, 12. Februar 2002 17:52 To: Hildenbrand, Patrick Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: cygrunsrv does not start sshd in 1 out of 40 installs This could be due to service start-up delays. There was discussion on this in last October or thereabouts: exactly what other ser

Re: cygrunsrv does not start sshd in 1 out of 40 installs

2002-02-12 Thread Luke Bakken
I specifically remember someone mentioning the "Browser" service Good Luck! On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Lassi A. Tuura wrote: > This could be due to service start-up delays. There was discussion on > this in last October or thereabouts: exactly what other services sshd > should depend on to start re

Re: cygrunsrv does not start sshd in 1 out of 40 installs

2002-02-12 Thread Lassi A. Tuura
This could be due to service start-up delays. There was discussion on this in last October or thereabouts: exactly what other services sshd should depend on to start reliably. IIRC there were different solutions for different conditions and no universal solution; the failures were caused by TCP/

RE: cygrunsrv does not start sshd in 1 out of 40 installs

2002-02-12 Thread Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
>From: Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Dienstag, 12. Februar 2002 17:13 >To: Hildenbrand, Patrick; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >Subject: Re: cygrunsrv does not start sshd in 1 out of 40 installs > > >At 10:45 AM 2/12/2002, Hildenbrand, Patrick

RE: cygrunsrv does not start sshd in 1 out of 40 installs

2002-02-12 Thread Hildenbrand, Patrick
6410 > F +49/6227/7-66301 > E [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.saphosting.com -Original Message- From: Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Dienstag, 12. Februar 2002 17:13 To: Hildenbrand, Patrick; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: cygrunsrv does

Re: cygrunsrv does not start sshd in 1 out of 40 installs

2002-02-12 Thread Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
At 10:45 AM 2/12/2002, Hildenbrand, Patrick wrote: >As I do not have access to the source, is there anybody, who either has >access to the source, so we can try to find out the reason or likes to >investigate this ? I'm curious. Why don't you "have access to the source"? You realize that it is