* Corinna Vinschen (Mon, 14 May 2007 14:18:35 +0200)
> On May 11 19:24, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> > * (Fri, 11 May 2007 19:25:01 +0200)
> > > Actually I seriously resent that you trying to portrait me as a fool
> > > who doesn't know what he doing. That coming from a visible member of
> > > the Cygw
On May 11 19:24, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> * (Fri, 11 May 2007 19:25:01 +0200)
> > Actually I seriously resent that you trying to portrait me as a fool
> > who doesn't know what he doing. That coming from a visible member of
> > the Cygwin project will certainly keep any others from giving any
> > u
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 05:23:33PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>AFAICT, I'm being consistent. Thank *you* for not sending another
>>multi-page diatribe in response to statements of facts.
>
>After first starting the attack you can't keep peace?
Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> AFAICT, I'm being consistent. Thank *you* for not sending another
> multi-page diatribe in response to statements of facts.
After first starting the attack you can't keep peace? You got my
answer by personal mail.
If it satisfies you: I'm alread
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 11:07:48AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR
>> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 09:52:33PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>>>Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 04:56:21PM
Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 09:52:33PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 04:56:21PM -0500, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
For the Cygwin folks, it is really a good idea to have the preferred
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 09:52:33PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 04:56:21PM -0500, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
For the Cygwin folks, it is really a good idea to have the preferred
usage of the logo docu
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 09:52:33PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 04:56:21PM -0500, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
>>> For the Cygwin folks, it is really a good idea to have the preferred
>>> usage of the logo documented in an easily accessible lo
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 04:56:21PM -0500, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
>> For the Cygwin folks, it is really a good idea to have the preferred
>> usage of the logo documented in an easily accessible location. This
>> long, drawn out, emotional thread has shown that nobody
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 04:56:21PM -0500, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
>For the Cygwin folks, it is really a good idea to have the preferred
>usage of the logo documented in an easily accessible location. This
>long, drawn out, emotional thread has shown that nobody really knows
>how someone can lega
[ - - words - - ]
Try these
http://www.redhat.com/software/cygwin/
http://www.uspto.gov/index.html (I didn't find anything under Cygwin
or RedHat and the stuff I found searching for Cygnus was not related
to this project at all).
Also, http://www.registeringatrademark.com/trademark-law-basics.
(Sorry if that arrives twice: My mail client is acting up and giving
wrong sender addresses: I therefore send it again, since I don't see
the first post arriving probably because of that.
My general apology to all: That will be my last post to the list in
that sorry affair and if Dave or Chr
On 11 May 2007 19:34, ls-cygwin-2006 wrote:
> "Dave Korn" writes:
>
>> On 11 May 2007 18:25, ls-cygwin-2006 wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>
>> You need to get it in writing, from Redhat's legal dept.
>
> Fine. Even links to the Cygwin FAQ (if it had such a section touching
> on the topic)? I'm a tad
"Dave Korn" writes:
> On 11 May 2007 18:25, ls-cygwin-2006 wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> You need to get it in writing, from Redhat's legal dept.
Fine. Even links to the Cygwin FAQ (if it had such a section touching
on the topic)? I'm a tad surprised.
> Nothing else is worth your time and effort.
* (Fri, 11 May 2007 19:25:01 +0200)
> Actually I seriously resent that you trying to portrait me as a fool
> who doesn't know what he doing. That coming from a visible member of
> the Cygwin project will certainly keep any others from giving any
> useful hints on that topic in this thread, after y
On 11 May 2007 18:25, ls-cygwin-2006 wrote:
[snip]
You need to get it in writing, from Redhat's legal dept. Nothing else is
worth your time and effort. To the best of my knowledge there has never been
any discussion before of anything remotely like this issue on the mailing
list. I think the
Dear Christopher Faylor,
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 04:13:12AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>Nonetheless I continue to be thankful for anybody's input (esp. if I
>>just missed a plainly visible and well known document on that topic
>>somewhere).
>
> It is unclear to me what kind of insight y
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 04:13:12AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Nonetheless I continue to be thankful for anybody's input (esp. if I
>just missed a plainly visible and well known document on that topic
>somewhere).
It is unclear to me what kind of insight you expect to get about matters
like
"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> If I understand it right, Cygwin is trademark of redhat and the Cygwin
>> logo is copyright protected.
>
>
>
>
>
> You should probably take this discussion to cygwin-licensing list.
Ooops, yes thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> If I understand it right, Cygwin is trademark of redhat and the Cygwin
> logo is copyright protected.
You should probably take this discussion to cygwin-licensing list.
--
Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.
20 matches
Mail list logo
