At 12:31 AM 12/20/2003, Rolf Campbell you wrote:
>Larry Hall wrote:
>>At 05:24 PM 12/13/2003, Hannu E K Nevalainen you wrote:
>>>PLEASE NOTE:
>>>** on a mailing list; please keep replies on that particular list **
>>I'm a little confused by the intent of your "note" above. If this is directed at
Larry Hall wrote:
At 05:24 PM 12/13/2003, Hannu E K Nevalainen you wrote:
PLEASE NOTE:
** on a mailing list; please keep replies on that particular list **
I'm a little confused by the intent of your "note" above. If this is
directed at me, I replied to your message the way I always reply, with
"
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 10:23:26PM +0100, Hannu E K Nevalainen wrote:
>>I was thinking about adding a cygwin-set-reply-to opt-in subscription
>>list for people (like me) who always want the reply-to set to the
>>mailing list. It would require a fair amount of rework of the spam
>>blocking software
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 11:39:25AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >I feel your pain, but there seems to be a light at the end of the tunnel.
> >I have Outlook Express 5 installed on my machine (though I don't use it),
> >and I've poked around a bit. Try going to the Tools->Accounts menu from
Christopher Faylor wrote on Monday, December 15, 2003 6:23 PM:
> I was thinking about adding a cygwin-set-reply-to opt-in
> subscription list for people (like me) who always want the
> reply-to set to the mailing list. It would require a fair
> amount of rework of the spam blocking software but it
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 08:26:34PM +0100, Hannu E K Nevalainen wrote:
> > > Well, no one knows everything. :-)
> >
> > I've also noted: The more you learn, the more you know that you don't know.
> > (Is that correct/good English? Feels bad to me in some way).
>
> I think that's fine English, tho
>
> I was thinking about adding a cygwin-set-reply-to opt-in
> subscription list for people (like me) who always want the
> reply-to set to the mailing list. It would require a fair
> amount of rework of the spam blocking software but it is doable.
>
> Would that be a useful feature?
This is
Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think this is how the BitKeeper folks do it, too, FWIW.
For the record, I'm pretty sure they've recently decided to stop doing
this, per this message¹ from Larry McVoy. Note the third paragraph
regarding "future directions." It sounds like they'l
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 12:22:47PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 11:39:25AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >I feel your pain, but there seems to be a light at the end of the tunnel.
> >I have Outlook Express 5 installed on my machine (though I don't use it),
> >and I
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 11:39:25AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>I feel your pain, but there seems to be a light at the end of the tunnel.
>I have Outlook Express 5 installed on my machine (though I don't use it),
>and I've poked around a bit. Try going to the Tools->Accounts menu from
>the mai
al Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
| Of Igor Pechtchanski
| Sent: 15 December 2003 16:39
| To: Hannu E K Nevalainen
| Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: [OT] RE: Third-party products that include Cygwin
|
| On Sun, 14 Dec 2003, Hannu E K Nevalainen wrote:
|
|
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003, Hannu E K Nevalainen wrote:
> > From: Larry Hall
> > Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2003 7:23 PM
>
> > At 05:24 PM 12/13/2003, Hannu E K Nevalainen you wrote:
> > >> From: Larry Hall
> > >> Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 8:21 PM
> > >
> > >
> > >PLEASE NOTE:
> > >** on a mailin
Hi. In Outlook XP at least, I just select "Reply To All" and it gets
the cygwin list, and I also use the "Reply" to direct correspondence.
Seems to work ok.
As for the business requires Outlook. Yeah I know. I did consulting
for one shop, and I was terrified, especially with all the viruses at
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 08:26:34PM +0100, Hannu E K Nevalainen wrote:
> > Well, no one knows everything. :-)
>
> I've also noted: The more you learn, the more you know that you don't know.
> (Is that correct/good English? Feels bad to me in some way).
I think that's fine English, though I think
At 02:26 PM 12/14/2003, Hannu E K Nevalainen you wrote:
>> From: Larry Hall
>> Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2003 7:23 PM
>
>> At 05:24 PM 12/13/2003, Hannu E K Nevalainen you wrote:
>> >> From: Larry Hall
>> >> Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 8:21 PM
>> >
>> >
>> >PLEASE NOTE:
>> >** on a mailing l
> From: Larry Hall
> Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2003 7:23 PM
> At 05:24 PM 12/13/2003, Hannu E K Nevalainen you wrote:
> >> From: Larry Hall
> >> Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 8:21 PM
> >
> >
> >PLEASE NOTE:
> >** on a mailing list; please keep replies on that particular list **
> I'm a littl
At 05:24 PM 12/13/2003, Hannu E K Nevalainen you wrote:
>> From: Larry Hall
>> Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 8:21 PM
>
>
>PLEASE NOTE:
>** on a mailing list; please keep replies on that particular list **
>
I'm a little confused by the intent of your "note" above. If this is
directed at me,
> From: Larry Hall
> Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 8:21 PM
PLEASE NOTE:
** on a mailing list; please keep replies on that particular list **
> I think both Chris, Rob, and others have pointed out gap in your setup
> knowledge here. 'Nuff said.
Thanks for not pushing it, this seems to be
At 04:53 PM 12/12/2003, Hannu E K Nevalainen you wrote:
>> From: Larry Hall
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 10:19 PM
>
>
>
>>David A Cobb:
>>> However, I'm
>>> wondering if we could make it easier? How about storing
>>> /HKLM/Cygnus Solutions/Cygwin/DLL_PATH="native:/path/to/cygwin1.dll and
>>>
On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 08:53, Hannu E K Nevalainen wrote:
> > An
> > alternative is a nice automated way in their installer to invoke the
> > Cygwin installer.
>
> Heh... that would IMO require setup.exe to be able to do batch runs. Not
> possible, unless changes has been done very recently.
It
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 05:04:11PM -0500, Robb, Sam wrote:
>>>An alternative is a nice automated way in their installer to invoke the
>>>Cygwin installer.
>>
>>Heh... that would IMO require setup.exe to be able to do batch runs.
>>Not possible, unless changes has been done very recently.
>
>Huh?
> > An
> > alternative is a nice automated way in their installer to invoke the
> > Cygwin installer.
>
> Heh... that would IMO require setup.exe to be able to do
> batch runs. Not
> possible, unless changes has been done very recently.
Huh? We've been doing things that way with our software
> From: Larry Hall
> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 10:19 PM
>David A Cobb:
>> However, I'm
>> wondering if we could make it easier? How about storing
>> /HKLM/Cygnus Solutions/Cygwin/DLL_PATH="native:/path/to/cygwin1.dll and
>> /HKLM/Cygnus
>> Solutions/Cygwin/DLL_VER
At 02:10 PM 12/9/2003, David A. Cobb you wrote:
>I recently tried out a couple of software packages -- SSH_CONFIGURATOR is one that
>sticks in my mind -- that are built with Cygwin. Their README documents said there
>wouldn't be a problem with a "properly installed" existing Cygwin. Well, there
24 matches
Mail list logo
