On Nov 29 15:00, David Macek wrote:
> On 26. 11. 2015 12:53, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Nov 24 20:51, David Macek wrote:
> >> My test command is `touch 1 && ln -s 1 2`, then I clean up by `rm 1 2`.
> >> Now the results:
> >>
> >> in /bin/: relative
> >> in /: absolute
> >> in ~/ (/cygdrive/c/U
On 26. 11. 2015 12:53, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Nov 24 20:51, David Macek wrote:
>> My test command is `touch 1 && ln -s 1 2`, then I clean up by `rm 1 2`. Now
>> the results:
>>
>> in /bin/: relative
>> in /: absolute
>> in ~/ (/cygdrive/c/Users/username/): relative
>> in /cygdrive/w/: absolu
On Nov 24 20:51, David Macek wrote:
> On 20. 11. 2015 10:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Nov 19 22:17, David Macek wrote:
> >> On 19. 11. 2015 20:36, Nellis, Kenneth wrote:
> >>> FWIW, my results are different:
> >>>
> >>> $ printenv CYGWIN
> >>> winsymlinks:nativestrict
> >>> $ touch XXX
> >>>
Can you describe what purpose does your C:\proc serve? I'm not currently
arguing for or against Corinna's proposal, I'm just curious.
--
David Macek
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
If it matters, the use case is `ln -sf /proc/self/fd /dev/fd`.
It matters. This is a bug in Cygwin, a missing test in fact. It should
never allow to create native symlinks to targets which only exist inside
of Cygwin.
Please don't. Why? It would be a b
On 20. 11. 2015 10:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Nov 19 22:17, David Macek wrote:
>> On 19. 11. 2015 20:36, Nellis, Kenneth wrote:
>>> FWIW, my results are different:
>>>
>>> $ printenv CYGWIN
>>> winsymlinks:nativestrict
>>> $ touch XXX
>>> $ ln -s XXX YYY
>>> $ ln -s YYY ZZZ
>>> $ ls -l
>>> to
On 20. 11. 2015 10:29, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Nov 19 19:53, David Macek wrote:
>> On 18. 11. 2015 20:48, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> On Nov 18 19:13, David Macek wrote:
On 18. 11. 2015 18:55, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Nov 17 23:28, David Macek wrote:
>> I went through the UG l
On Nov 19 19:53, David Macek wrote:
> On 18. 11. 2015 20:48, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Nov 18 19:13, David Macek wrote:
> >> On 18. 11. 2015 18:55, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>> On Nov 17 23:28, David Macek wrote:
> I went through the UG looking for differences between regular Cygwin
> >>
On Nov 19 22:17, David Macek wrote:
> On 19. 11. 2015 20:36, Nellis, Kenneth wrote:
> > FWIW, my results are different:
> >
> > $ printenv CYGWIN
> > winsymlinks:nativestrict
> > $ touch XXX
> > $ ln -s XXX YYY
> > $ ln -s YYY ZZZ
> > $ ls -l
> > total 0
> > -rw-r- 1 knellis Domain Users 0 Nov
On 19. 11. 2015 20:36, Nellis, Kenneth wrote:
> FWIW, my results are different:
>
> $ printenv CYGWIN
> winsymlinks:nativestrict
> $ touch XXX
> $ ln -s XXX YYY
> $ ln -s YYY ZZZ
> $ ls -l
> total 0
> -rw-r- 1 knellis Domain Users 0 Nov 19 14:28 XXX
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 knellis Domain Users 3 Nov 19
From: David Macek
> On 18. 11. 2015 20:48, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Nov 18 19:13, David Macek wrote:
> >> On 18. 11. 2015 18:55, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>> On Nov 17 23:28, David Macek wrote:
> I went through the UG looking for differences between regular Cygwin
> symlinks and NT
On 18. 11. 2015 20:48, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Nov 18 19:13, David Macek wrote:
>> On 18. 11. 2015 18:55, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> On Nov 17 23:28, David Macek wrote:
I went through the UG looking for differences between regular Cygwin
symlinks and NTFS symlinks, but couldn't find
On Nov 18 13:01, Warren Young wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2015, at 12:48 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> >> If not, I can send a patch for the UG.
> >
> > UG?
>
> User guide.
Ouch, right, thanks :)
Patches to the documentation are *always* welcome.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Pl
On Nov 18, 2015, at 12:48 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
>> If not, I can send a patch for the UG.
>
> UG?
User guide.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:
On Nov 18 19:13, David Macek wrote:
> On 18. 11. 2015 18:55, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Nov 17 23:28, David Macek wrote:
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> I went through the UG looking for differences between regular Cygwin
> >> symlinks and NTFS symlinks, but couldn't find this documented. It
> >> seems that
On 18. 11. 2015 18:55, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Nov 17 23:28, David Macek wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I went through the UG looking for differences between regular Cygwin
>> symlinks and NTFS symlinks, but couldn't find this documented. It
>> seems that when using winsymlinks:native, the target path is
On Nov 17 23:28, David Macek wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I went through the UG looking for differences between regular Cygwin
> symlinks and NTFS symlinks, but couldn't find this documented. It
> seems that when using winsymlinks:native, the target path is first
> dereferenced before storing it in the link.
17 matches
Mail list logo