: Alan Dobkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 7:08 AM
> To: Cygwin
> Cc: Robert Collins
> Subject: RE: New version of setup - prerelease available
>
>
> --On Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:41 PM +1000 Robert Collins
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&g
ox note: Installation Complete
2002/05/03 12:15:50 Ending cygwin install
>Rob
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mark Himsley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:17 PM
>
, May 03, 2002 9:17 PM
> To: Cygwin
> Subject: Re: New version of setup - prerelease available
>
>
> On Wed, 1 May 2002 21:33:22 +1000 you wrote:
>
> >I've uploaded a new version of setup.exe, and source, to
> >http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-md5-20
On Wed, 1 May 2002 21:33:22 +1000 you wrote:
>I've uploaded a new version of setup.exe, and source, to
>http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-md5-20020501.exe
I've just tried to use this...
As usual, I did a 'Download from Internet' followed by an 'Install from
Local Drive'.
The downloa
--On Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:41 PM +1000 Robert Collins
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, can you build setup from the -src tarball,
> and run it under gdb? If it crashes then, you can type\
>
> 'bt full'
> and send me or the list the output.
I haven't tried compiling the source yet, but usin
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Dobkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:54 AM
> When I run this new version (2.216) and select "Install from
> Local Directory", as soon as setup gets to the "Progress"
> window (before
> listing any available packages), t
--On Wednesday, May 01, 2002 9:33 PM +1000 Robert Collins
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've uploaded a new version of setup.exe, and source, to
> http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-md5-20020501.exe and
> http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-md5-20020501-src.tar.bz2.
When I run t
After a little experimentation, it appears that it doesn't
matter what the file is called - if there's any file in the top
level of the local directory with the format of a setup.ini
file, it gets used for determining the timestamp to put
in /etc/setup/timestamp. But its contents thankfully don't
> Are you 100% positive you have no other setup.ini's? Perhaps an old one
> in the local dir root?
Aha! Found it - I had renamed an old setup.ini with this timestamp
to setup.ini.sav (in the local directory). I don't think setup.exe
should be taking any notice of a file with this name though!
From: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Are you 100% positive you have no other setup.ini's? Perhaps an old one
> in the local dir root?
Yes - using Find (the Windows version) on all my hard disks found
quite a few setup.ini's of course, but only one was a Cygwin one,
and this is the ri
> -Original Message-
> From: Cliff Hones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:56 PM
> Yes - it did, and the install worked fine. After this my
> /etc/setup/timestamp now contains 1016041807, and setup no
> longer shows the warning re out-of-date setup.ini.
Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Cliff Hones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:12 PM
>
> > When I try "install from local directory" and select the
> > defaults (ie install everything which has been updated) setup
> > gets as far as showing t
> -Original Message-
> From: Cliff Hones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:12 PM
> When I try "install from local directory" and select the
> defaults (ie install everything which has been updated) setup
> gets as far as showing the install progress box,
Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've uploaded a new version of setup.exe, and source, to
> http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-md5-20020501.exe and
> http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-md5-20020501-src.tar.bz2.
>
> New features:
> * Allows source only packages.
> * C
14 matches
Mail list logo
