> From: Eric Blake
> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 14:19
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: New package: makeself-2.1.5-2
>
> ...
> Perhaps unspoken, but I prefer suffix-less executables. Then I don't
> have to care whether they are binary or interpreted
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 05:44:34PM -0400, Lee D. Rothstein wrote:
> >>> 2010/4/28, Lee D. Rothstein
> >>> FWIW, the man page says makeself, not makeself.sh.
>
> I actually didn't say that, but I alluded to it.
That is true:
From: "Lee Maschmeyer"
It was another Lee...
>
> First some importan
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:19:27PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/28/2010 12:12 PM, d.sastre.medina wrote:
> >> 2010/4/28, Lee D. Rothstein:
> >> FWIW, the man page says makeself, not makeself.sh.
> >
> > Fair enough.
> > Two options, then:
> >
> > -patching the manpage
> > -pat
Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/28/2010 12:12 PM, Sastre wrote:
>>> 2010/4/28, Lee D. Rothstein
>>> FWIW, the man page says makeself, not makeself.sh.
I actually didn't say that, but I alluded to it.
>> Fair enough.
>> Two options, then:
>>
>> -patching the manpage
>> -patching the s
On 04/28/2010 12:12 PM, d.sastre.med...@gmail.com wrote:
>> 2010/4/28, Lee D. Rothstein :
>> FWIW, the man page says makeself, not makeself.sh.
>
> Fair enough.
> Two options, then:
>
> -patching the manpage
> -patching the source and the cygport
>
> None of them involve too much
> 2010/4/28, Lee D. Rothstein :
>FWIW, the man page says makeself, not makeself.sh.
Fair enough.
Two options, then:
-patching the manpage
-patching the source and the cygport
None of them involve too much work. So now I would like to know (from
some authoritative source :)) if a
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 05:33:03PM +0200, David Sastre wrote:
> 2010/4/28, Lee D. Rothstein :
^^^
Ouch...!
There is something _evil_ in those webmails.
Sorry.
*goes to write 100 times PCYMTNQREAIYR in the blackboard*
--
Huella de clave primaria:
Hello,
>Shouldn't this be:
>$ makeself.sh -h ?
Yes. The correct way to invoke makeself is calling `makeself.sh'.
/usr/bin/makeself-header.sh
/usr/bin/makeself.sh
>Why are we using the '.sh' extension with 'makeself', again?
Upstream sources keep the extension, other distros strip it, i.e. Debi
david sastre wrote:
New package "makeself-2.1.5-2" has been uploaded.
makeself is a small shell script that generates a self-extractable
archive from a directory. The resulting file appears as a shell script
(many of those have a .run suffix), and can be launched as is. The
archive will then unc
9 matches
Mail list logo
