[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Well, I *did* skip the libpng update...
Ok. Mabye people 'should be warned' about skipping updates, in some
broadest sense of the word?
> The only obvious indication that something is missing is
> that the end of the post-install script, a window pops up
> saying "m
===
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> xv which I uses quite often, and it obviously depends
> on libpng and I would rather not break it.
The package maintainers try very hard to prevent *backwards*
compatability issues. You should not need to fear upgrading.
Rob
--
Uns
ething is missing is
that the end of the post-install script, a window pops up
saying "missing import ... ".
-Original Message-
From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 January 2002 09:30
To: hin-tak.leung; Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Cc: cygwin
Subject: Re:
- Original Message -
From: "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > BTW - pdftex in tetex-20001208-4 depends on the
> > new (10-days-old) libpng 1.0.2.
>
> Hmm, that's not good. Does that package have a new name? Otherwise
> we're in dire need of versioned depends.
I wouldn't describ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Just to confirm that with the latest tetex-20001208-4
> and the cygwin texmf-*-* packages I don't need to
> set TEXMFMAIN anymore - although I still have
> TEXINPUTS and the font related variables set to
> "${HOME}/somewhere//:" for my CJK stuff.
>
> Well-done!
Thank
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 29 January 2002 13:46
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: New on sourceware: texmf-2804-2
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
>>My Texmf tree came from the stock teTeX 1.0.2
>>
>
> Ok, so y
nhuizen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 January 2002 13:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New on sourceware: texmf-2804-2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> My Texmf tree came from the stock teTeX 1.0.2
Ok, so you're not using the texmf packages, and not usin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> My Texmf tree came from the stock teTeX 1.0.2
Ok, so you're not using the texmf packages, and not using the latest
tetex-beta...
> Without setting TEXMFMAIN, it looks like latex is trying to look for
> the texmf tree under //share rather than /usr/share .
Could be.
and I can see why the cygwin binaries shouldn't be able to do it
correctly...
-Original Message-
From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 January 2002 10:29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New on sourceware: texmf-2804-2
[EMAIL PR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I have been using 20001218-1 for quite a while now ... but I have
> always had problems with having to set some environment variables.
Did you install any of the texmf-tiny or texmf-base packages?
> It is currently fully functional including typesetting CJK
> docume
Hiya,
I have been using 20001218-1 for quite a while now (and
in fact I did my own cygwin port of teTeX about 6 months
before it was included in cygwin/contrib), but I have always
had problems with having to set some environment variables.
Currently for 20001218-1 I have to set TEXMFMAIN to /usr/
11 matches
Mail list logo
