On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 08:37:02PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 03:47:27PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
>>Sorry...I didn't mean to embarrass you. I was hoping for something a
>>little more juicy, I guess--it's been a slow soggy shut-in sort of day
>>(and week) out he
Chris,
At 17:37 2002-12-19, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 03:47:27PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
>Sorry...I didn't mean to embarrass you. I was hoping for something a
>little more juicy, I guess--it's been a slow soggy shut-in sort of day
>(and week) out here... Rain, rai
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 03:47:27PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
>Sorry...I didn't mean to embarrass you. I was hoping for something a
>little more juicy, I guess--it's been a slow soggy shut-in sort of day
>(and week) out here... Rain, rain and more rain. Then it rains.
For the record, I actu
Pierre,
Sorry...I didn't mean to embarrass you. I was hoping for something a little
more juicy, I guess--it's been a slow soggy shut-in sort of day (and week)
out here... Rain, rain and more rain. Then it rains.
Randall Schulz
At 15:39 2002-12-19, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
At 03:24 PM 12/19/20
At 03:24 PM 12/19/2002 -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
>Information please! What was the problem?
A stupid bug of mine, mixing up variable names, with
non-deterministic results.
It's surprising that it took so long to emerge, but before
the buggy code was put in, grep -r didn't work at all on Win9
Yo, Pierre! Buddy!
Information please! What was the problem?
Inquiring technominds want to know!
Randall Schulz
At 15:19 2002-12-19, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
At 04:21 PM 12/19/2002 -0500, Mark Blackburn wrote:
>If I type:
>$ grep -e hello -r .
>I get:
>grep: .: File exists
It's a pro
At 04:21 PM 12/19/2002 -0500, Mark Blackburn wrote:
>If I type:
>$ grep -e hello -r .
>I get:
>grep: .: File exists
It's a problem on Win9x only, patch is on the way.
Thanks for the report.
Pierre
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 05:33:32PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Not likely. I believe this package is provided by Chris Faylor.
>If I'm right, I know he builds everything on Linux with a cross compiler.
>But you could be right about this being a 9x issue. Dunno. Can't
>tell.
It could also
Mark,
I cannot reproduce your problem, but perhaps it's an interaction with FAT
file systems and Windows '98? I have Windows 2K Pro and only one FAT
volume, but the command you gave works fine for me on both my NTFS and my
FAT volumes. There's also the possibility of this being an issue with yo
PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:52:28 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Grep says file exists and then doesn't grep it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Works fine here but I'm on W2K. Does 'grep -r -e hello .' or
>'grep -r hello .' work?
>
>
No and
Mark Blackburn wrote:
If I type:
$ grep -e hello -r .
I get:
grep: .: File exists
and grep doesn't search the contents of any files
Data point: doesn't happen with the stock grep 2.5-1 on 1.3.17-1 on
WinXP Pro SP1 (everything's the same except the OS). Works fine here.
--
Unsubscribe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Works fine here but I'm on W2K. Does 'grep -r -e hello .' or
'grep -r hello .' work?
No and No. Same result as before.
Maybe compiling on Win98 makes some sort of difference? I assume it was
originally compiled on W2K.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml
Works fine here but I'm on W2K. Does 'grep -r -e hello .' or
'grep -r hello .' work?
Larry
Original Message:
-
From: Mark Blackburn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:21:28 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Grep says file exists and then doesn't "grep" it
If I type:
13 matches
Mail list logo
