Re: GCC Include Paths

2002-12-12 Thread Shankar Unni
Vijay Sampath wrote: I just tried out a line with 2 characters and it works fine on bash as an input to GCC. I think that direct Cygwin-to-Cygwin invocation has a higher limit. If you're calling a Cygwin program from a non-Cygwin program (e.g. CMD.EXE), you're still stuck with Windows limi

RE: GCC Include Paths

2002-12-12 Thread Randall R Schulz
Vijay, I guess I was misled by this: /usr/include/limits.h:#define _POSIX_ARG_MAX 4096 /usr/include/sys/syslimits.h:#define ARG_MAX 65536 /* max bytes for an exec function */ Furthermore, "/usr/include/limits.h" bears a Red Hat copyright and is specifically marked as a "part of Cygwin," while

RE: GCC Include Paths

2002-12-12 Thread Vijay Sampath
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 10:43 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: GCC Include Paths > > > Vijay, Allan, > > Cygwin is similarly limited. All Unix / POSIX systems have > such a limit, > but Cygwin's limit is much smaller than the typical limit

RE: GCC Include Paths

2002-12-12 Thread Randall R Schulz
Vijay, Allan, Cygwin is similarly limited. All Unix / POSIX systems have such a limit, but Cygwin's limit is much smaller than the typical limit on a Unix (-like) system. I don't know it for a fact, but I'm pretty sure this limit is not imposed by Cygwin itself (why would it?) but is a Windows

RE: GCC Include Paths

2002-12-12 Thread Vijay Sampath
Yes, we have faced a similar problem. The problem is with the windows command shell which limits a line to 2048 characters. I don't know how to make that problem go away. But you shouldn't get the same problem from a cygwin shell. Thanks, Vijay > -Original Message- > From: Allan Crook [m