Dave Korn wrote:
On 10 January 2007 01:43, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
It's not old code but gcc is a long time package. Looks like it
incorrectly picked up cygintl-3.dll for cc1.exe the last time it was
built. But looking at the setup.hint files, it correctly says that it
depends on it. So
On 10 January 2007 01:43, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> It's not old code but gcc is a long time package. Looks like it incorrectly
> picked up cygintl-3.dll for cc1.exe the last time it was built. But looking
> at the setup.hint files, it correctly says that it depends on it. So if you
> were
Sam The Cat wrote:
According to Morgan Gangwere on 1/9/2007 11:14 AM:
this outlines my point exactly. we need to give _all_ of the mirrors
not a _48_ hour but at max a _24_ hour.
You need more convincing arguments if you want the current mirror policy
to change.
and _all_ the mirrors shou
Sam The Cat wrote:
According to Morgan Gangwere on 1/9/2007 11:14 AM:
this outlines my point exactly. we need to give _all_ of the mirrors
not a _48_ hour but at max a _24_ hour.
You need more convincing arguments if you want the current mirror policy
to change.
and _all_ the mirrors shou
According to Morgan Gangwere on 1/9/2007 11:14 AM:
this outlines my point exactly. we need to give _all_ of the mirrors
not a _48_ hour but at max a _24_ hour.
You need more convincing arguments if you want the current mirror policy
to change.
and _all_ the mirrors should
have the same pac
On 09 January 2007 17:57, Morgan Gangwere wrote:
> this was a good 6 months ago, and i cant get acess to my log books (im
> at school, and my log books were kept by the client). IMIR what is the
> more pressing issue is that _we_ should provide a script that
> _nightly_ (im serious) gets the lates
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 10:57:01AM -0700, Morgan Gangwere wrote:
>this was a good 6 months ago, and i cant get acess to my log books (im
>at school, and my log books were kept by the client). IMIR what is the
>more pressing issue is that _we_ should provide a script that
>_nightly_ (im serious) get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Morgan Gangwere on 1/9/2007 11:14 AM:
> this outlines my point exactly. we need to give _all_ of the mirrors
> not a _48_ hour but at max a _24_ hour.
You need more convincing arguments if you want the current mirror policy
to change.
>
On 1/9/07, Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Morgan Gangwere on 1/9/2007 10:57 AM:
> an _example_ of how the mirrors have been different is that I have
> found different version numbers for all of the mirrors that host
> X/Cygwin (a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Morgan Gangwere on 1/9/2007 10:57 AM:
> an _example_ of how the mirrors have been different is that I have
> found different version numbers for all of the mirrors that host
> X/Cygwin (a big part of what i am doing) so i cant be shure wha
this was a good 6 months ago, and i cant get acess to my log books (im
at school, and my log books were kept by the client). IMIR what is the
more pressing issue is that _we_ should provide a script that
_nightly_ (im serious) gets the latest files.
an _example_ of how the mirrors have been diffe
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 10:25:33AM -, Dave Korn wrote:
>On 09 January 2007 01:06, Morgan Gangwere wrote:
>>well, there is a fundamental flaw here in the distribution system then.
>>i have looked at the versions from (agast!) three different mirrors and
>>they have so far been completely differe
On 09 January 2007 01:06, Morgan Gangwere wrote:
> well, there is a fundamental flaw here in the distribution system then.
> i have looked at the versions from (agast!) three different mirrors
> and they have so far been completely different.
It would have been helpful if you said *which* mirro
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: help win winxp install
Sam The Cat wrote:
Morgan
Thanks for confirming -- I find it funny that I would have to check
mirror upo
Sam The Cat wrote:
Morgan
Thanks for confirming -- I find it funny that I would have to check
mirror upon mirror to find a package needed for a basic part of the
packgage. Makes me wonder what I am missing ;) I am not deeply
involved in the SW distrbution via mirrors business but I wou
ammers.
> Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 9:37 PM
> Subject: Re: Fw: help win winxp install
>
>
>> Sam The Cat wrote:
>>> figure this one out (I think)
>>>
>>> the first pass of the gcc (cc1) was looking for a dll "cygintl-3.dll"
>>> this
that
after a new release all mirrors would eventually be updated
Cheers
Eric
- Original Message -
From: "Morgan Gangwere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 8:05 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: help win winxp install
well, there is a fundamental flaw here in
quot;
> cygwin com>
> To: cygwin com>
^^
<http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR>. No need to feed the spammers.
> Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 9:37 PM
> Subject: Re: Fw: help win winxp install
>
>
>> Sam The Cat
e spammers.
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 9:37 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: help win winxp install
Sam The Cat wrote:
figure this one out (I think)
the first pass of the gcc (cc1) was looking for a dll "cygintl-3.dll"
this could not be found. I did find "cygintl-8.dll" which shows
all a package that I need that setup does not offer me ?
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 9:37 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: help win winxp install
Sam The Cat wrote:
figure this one out (I think)
the first
Sam The Cat wrote:
figure this one out (I think)
the first pass of the gcc (cc1) was looking for a dll "cygintl-3.dll"
this could not be found. I did find "cygintl-8.dll" which shows
modification as of 10/22/2006. Not sure if it is a complete fix but I
copied the "cygintl-8.dll" file and
21 matches
Mail list logo
