Re: Cygwin.dll version in bug reports

2012-02-10 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]! > I wouldn't presume to speak for the package maintainers. However, I > would guess that people assume that the package version is the latest. > (I do.) So if one is up to date, why the need to point it out in the > subject line? Because "latest" is

RE: Cygwin.dll version in bug reports

2012-02-09 Thread Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]
Matt Seitz (matseitz) sent the following at Thursday, February 09, 2012 3:04 PM >> On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 05:17:18PM -0800, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote: >> > >> >Today I sent a couple of bug reports. I based my "Subject" on the >> >examples" given at: >> > >> >http://cygwin.com/problems.html >> >

Re: Cygwin.dll version in bug reports

2012-02-09 Thread Matt Seitz (matseitz)
"Christopher Faylor" wrote: > On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 05:17:18PM -0800, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote: > > > >Today I sent a couple of bug reports. I based my "Subject" on the "Good > >examples" given at: > > > >http://cygwin.com/problems.html > > > >Since all the good examples had a cygwin1.dll ver

Re: Cygwin.dll version in bug reports

2012-02-08 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 05:17:18PM -0800, Matt Seitz (matseitz) wrote: >"Christopher Faylor" wrote in message >news:<20120209005328.gb23...@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>... >> >> Same thing in 1.7.9. >> >> Please lets not just put 1.7.10 in front of every bug report. > >What is the proper procedure? > >Toda