>
> It's there - try unchecking the check box to show obsolete
> packages. But as more-2.11o-1 really does depend on libpcre,
> it needs to be recompiled to pick up the security flaw.
>
> Meanwhile, as a temporary workaround, I've updated the setup.hint
> to depend on libpcre until a new more is
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Eric Blake
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 5:51 PM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: RE: Command 'more': missing dll cygpcre.dll [Attn more
maintainer]
> It's there - try unchecking the
> It's there - try unchecking the check box to show obsolete
> packages. But as more-2.11o-1 really does depend on libpcre,
> it needs to be recompiled to pick up the security flaw.
^
the _fix in libpcre0 to_ the security flaw _in libpcre_.
-
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com]
> On Behalf
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR. Also, you can
trim your quoted reply to the relevant portions, instead of replying
with everything.
> As far as I can see, it's st
4 matches
Mail list logo
