RE: Aspell - Ispell

2004-04-01 Thread Gareth Pearce
> Gareth Pearce wrote: > > > It should be relatively easy to write a very simple script called ispell > > which calls 'aspell -a $@' > > I think that works at least... can't say I've tried it. > > Such a script exists: /usr/share/aspell/ispell > > An obvious way to make it available to programs

Re: Aspell - Ispell

2004-04-01 Thread Andreas Seidl
Gareth Pearce wrote: It should be relatively easy to write a very simple script called ispell which calls 'aspell -a $@' I think that works at least... can't say I've tried it. Such a script exists: /usr/share/aspell/ispell An obvious way to make it available to programs would be: cd /usr/bin

Re: Aspell - Ispell

2004-03-29 Thread Steven E. Harris
Andy Rushton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Or is it possible to use aspell within emacs? On XEmacs at least, this is all it takes: (eval-after-load "ispell" '(progn (setq ispell-program-name "aspell"))) I load those forms from my init file and aspell works just as ispell did before. All

RE: Aspell - Ispell

2004-03-29 Thread Gareth Pearce
> > > > > I would support this for another reason: ispell is integrated with the > various emacsen and gives my such features as flyspell (on-the-fly spell > check). I just did a clean reinstall of Cygwin and spent a while > tracking down the latest ispell release - it would be som much better if >

Re: Aspell - Ispell

2004-03-29 Thread Andy Rushton
Gregory Borota wrote: But still I *personally* would prefer if Pierre A. Humblet's Ispell port would be part of cygwin distribution too as his ispell is much faster than current aspell (at least for english). I tried to use aspell it just makes me mad, it's so extremely slow. I had to switch back