Re: [toplevel, Cygwin] Don't warn if both newlib and winsup are missing

2004-10-12 Thread DJ Delorie
> 2004-10-12 Kelley Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * configure.in (*-*-cygwin*): Supress warning when newlib not present. > * configure: Regenerate. This is OK. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html

RE: [toplevel, Cygwin] Don't warn if both newlib and winsup are missing

2004-10-12 Thread Dave Korn
> -Original Message- > From: Kelley Cook > Sent: 12 October 2004 18:42 > --- Zack Weinberg wrote: > > > Kelley Cook writes: > > > >> In July a patch was added to the Cygwin's toplevel that turns off > >> newlib if winsup isn't also present. > > > > Hang on, is this even the right thing

Re: [toplevel, Cygwin] Don't warn if both newlib and winsup are missing

2004-10-12 Thread Kelley Cook
--- Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kelley Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> In July a patch was added to the Cygwin's toplevel that turns off >> newlib if winsup isn't also present. > > Hang on, is this even the right thing? Aren't there embedded targets > that use newlib but n

RE: [toplevel, Cygwin] Don't warn if both newlib and winsup are missing

2004-10-12 Thread Dave Korn
> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Zack Weinberg > Sent: 12 October 2004 18:25 > Kelley Cook writes: > > > In July a patch was added to the Cygwin's toplevel that > turns off newlib > > if winsup isn't also present. > > Hang on, is this even the right thing? Aren'

Re: [toplevel, Cygwin] Don't warn if both newlib and winsup are missing

2004-10-12 Thread Zack Weinberg
Kelley Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In July a patch was added to the Cygwin's toplevel that turns off newlib > if winsup isn't also present. Hang on, is this even the right thing? Aren't there embedded targets that use newlib but not winsup? zw -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.co