On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
>
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Peter A. Castro
> > > Sent: 30 March 2004 19:45
> >
> > > The original issue was with the executable /usr/bin/zsh being
> > > a link to the
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Peter A. Castro
> > Sent: 30 March 2004 19:45
>
> > The original issue was with the executable /usr/bin/zsh being
> > a link to the real exe (eg: zsh-4.2.0). However, this is not
> > a packagi
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Peter A. Castro
> > Sent: 30 March 2004 19:45
>
> > The original issue was with the executable /usr/bin/zsh being
> > a link to the real exe (eg: zsh-4.2.0). However, this is not
> > a packagi
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Peter A. Castro
> Sent: 30 March 2004 19:45
> The original issue was with the executable /usr/bin/zsh being
> a link to the real exe (eg: zsh-4.2.0). However, this is not
> a packaging error, IMHO. /usr/bin/zsh is a *hardlink*,
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, David Rayner wrote:
> Peter,
Greetings David,
> There is a posting in Gmane which explains that it's a packaging error
> >Sounds like a packaging bug.
Well, I am the Cygwin maintainer for zsh, and there are two issues:
The original issue was with the executable /usr/bin/zs
6 -0800 (PST)
From: "Peter A. Castro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: zzapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Copies to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: zsh-4.2.0-1
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, zzapper wrote:
>
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Peter A. Castro wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Alejandro Lopez-Valencia wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:07:00 -0500 (EST), Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >
> > >Sounds like a packaging bug.
> >
> > And right you are:
> >
> > $ cat /etc/postinstall/zsh.sh.done
> > #!/bin/sh
> >
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 02:40:23PM -0800, Peter A. Castro wrote:
> >On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Peter A. Castro wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, zzapper wrote:
> >> > > On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:40:59 +
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 02:40:23PM -0800, Peter A. Castro wrote:
>On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Peter A. Castro wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> > On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, zzapper wrote:
>> > > On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:40:59 +0100, wrote:
>> > > >On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:09:28 -0500 (ES
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Peter A. Castro wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, zzapper wrote:
> > > On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:40:59 +0100, wrote:
> > > >On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:09:28 -0500 (EST), wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>An updated version of zsh (zsh-4.2.0-1) has
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Alejandro Lopez-Valencia wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:07:00 -0500 (EST), Igor Pechtchanski wrote in
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >Sounds like a packaging bug.
>
> And right you are:
>
> $ cat /etc/postinstall/zsh.sh.done
> #!/bin/sh
> V=4.1.1
> ^^^
> Should be 4.2.0
Oh,
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, zzapper wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:40:59 +0100, wrote:
> >
> > >On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:09:28 -0500 (EST), wrote:
> > >
> > >>An updated version of zsh (zsh-4.2.0-1) has been released and should be
> > >>at a mirror nea
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, zzapper wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:40:59 +0100, wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:09:28 -0500 (EST), wrote:
> >
> >>An updated version of zsh (zsh-4.2.0-1) has been released and should be
> >>at a mirror near you real soon.
> >>
> >Hi I saw zsh 4.2.0 download this morn
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:07:00 -0500 (EST), Igor Pechtchanski wrote in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>Sounds like a packaging bug.
And right you are:
$ cat /etc/postinstall/zsh.sh.done
#!/bin/sh
V=4.1.1
^^^
Should be 4.2.0
prefix=/usr
infodir=${prefix}/share/info
[snip]
# Install default zprofile i
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:07:00 -0500 (EST), wrote:
>
>What's weird is the fact that running "zsh" showed version 4.1.1. Even
>with the symlink this should not have happened. I assume running
>"zsh-4.2.0" would show version 4.2.0, right? It would be interesting to
>see if you have other copies o
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, zzapper wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:40:59 +0100, wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:09:28 -0500 (EST), wrote:
> >
> >>An updated version of zsh (zsh-4.2.0-1) has been released and should be
> >>at a mirror near you real soon.
> >>
> >Hi I saw zsh 4.2.0 download this morn
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:40:59 +0100, wrote:
>On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:09:28 -0500 (EST), wrote:
>
>>An updated version of zsh (zsh-4.2.0-1) has been released and should be
>>at a mirror near you real soon.
>>
>Hi I saw zsh 4.2.0 download this morning when I ran my daily setup
>however (having reset
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:09:28 -0500 (EST), wrote:
>An updated version of zsh (zsh-4.2.0-1) has been released and should be
>at a mirror near you real soon.
>
Hi I saw zsh 4.2.0 download this morning when I ran my daily setup
however (having reset my PC as requested)
zsh --version
zsh 4.1.1 (i686-
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
>
> > * Peter A. Castro (2004-03-26 18:10 +0100)
> > > BTW, I've tried many, many ways to reproduce your original hang
> > > problem but am still unable to do so.
> >
> > One last try: I have recently set op
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> * Peter A. Castro (2004-03-26 18:10 +0100)
> > BTW, I've tried many, many ways to reproduce your original hang
> > problem but am still unable to do so.
>
> One last try: I have recently set option "autocd"[1]. Now when I type
> something like "adksfaj"
* Peter A. Castro (2004-03-26 18:10 +0100)
> BTW, I've tried many, many ways to reproduce your original hang
> problem but am still unable to do so.
One last try: I have recently set option "autocd"[1]. Now when I type
something like "adksfaj" the delay (~ 10 seconds) is the same like
with the cor
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
> * Peter A. Castro (2004-03-26 16:09 +0100)
> > An updated version of zsh (zsh-4.2.0-1) has been released and should be
> > at a mirror near you real soon.
>
> Thank you.
Your welcome.
BTW, I've tried many, many ways to reproduce your original hang pro
* Peter A. Castro (2004-03-26 16:09 +0100)
> An updated version of zsh (zsh-4.2.0-1) has been released and should be
> at a mirror near you real soon.
Thank you.
Thorsten
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Do
23 matches
Mail list logo
