[update] base-files (was: RE: /etc/profile - futile try to predict order of execution)

2003-09-21 Thread John Morrison
> Subject: RE: /etc/profile - futile try to predict order of execution AFAIK /etc/profile *never* tried to predict/guarentee order of execution. If packages made an assumption, well you know the saying. > - `/bin/find /etc/profile.d -iname '*.sh' -type f` > +

Re: /etc/profile - futile try to predict order of execution (Please inform maintainer of 00xfree.sh)

2003-09-19 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 05:23:40PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 04:59:07PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >> >Speaking of your machine, could this be because you're using Win98? >> >(Checking) Bingo! Somehow, on Win98

Re: /etc/profile - futile try to predict order of execution

2003-09-19 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 12:14:37AM +0200, Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) wrote: >> From: Igor Pechtchanski > >Please, Igor - I got FOUR COPIES of this... - just one of them ended >up in the cygwin ML folder. He was trying to bypass the subject blocker. Several keywords are blocked here rega

RE: /etc/profile - futile try to predict order of execution

2003-09-19 Thread Hannu E K Nevalainen \(garbage mail\)
> From: Igor Pechtchanski Please, Igor - I got FOUR COPIES of this... - just one of them ended up in the cygwin ML folder. > On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) wrote: > > > While looking for the reason why "less" has stopped understanding the > > BACKSPACE key (and a bunch

Re: /etc/profile - futile try to predict order of execution

2003-09-19 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) wrote: > While looking for the reason why "less" has stopped understanding the > BACKSPACE key (and a bunch of others) I stumbled over the following. > > I'm sending this just to INFORM about it. > I'm NOT on the xfree list. > I'm NOT intere