On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 00:35 -0600, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 16:50 -0300, Thomas Wuillemin wrote:
> > While running some simple tests with the C vprintf function, I
> > detected different results between Gcc and Clang , where Clang seems
> > to be badly wrong.
> >
> > Here is
On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 16:50 -0300, Thomas Wuillemin wrote:
> While running some simple tests with the C vprintf function, I
> detected different results between Gcc and Clang , where Clang seems
> to be badly wrong.
>
> Here is the faulty code that leads to a reproducible error (at least
> in my c
On 03/02/2015 19:50, Thomas Wuillemin wrote:
clang -Wall -Wextra -pedantic -g -O0 dummy.c -o dummy.exe
As a reference point this works fine on FreeBSD with both:-
FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot1-final 208032) 20140512
FreeBSD clang version 3.5.1 (tags/RELEASE_351/final 225668)
Dear all,
While running some simple tests with the C vprintf function, I
detected different results between Gcc and Clang , where Clang seems
to be badly wrong.
Here is the faulty code that leads to a reproducible error (at least
in my configuration):
4 matches
Mail list logo