Sorry;
From my admittedly confused reading of the list traffic, I thought
that the patches in the snapshot would also work on 64-bit.
Ben
On Dec 4 02:20, Ben wrote:
> Just wanted to drop in a note saying that I've tried the snapshot on
> RTM Vista x64 on AMD, and I had no luck, either freshl
On Dec 4 02:20, Ben wrote:
> Just wanted to drop in a note saying that I've tried the snapshot on
> RTM Vista x64 on AMD, and I had no luck, either freshly installed, or
> with rebase/rebaseall. I tried rebaseall with ash, but got the usual
> Vista-related errors. I tried running rebase against as
, but still no joy. All of the above I ran using first
0x7000 as base, and then 0x6500.
Hope this helps!
Ben
- Original Message -
From: "Corinna Vinschen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 9:48 AM
Subject: Please test the latest developer&
On 11/7/2006 10:04 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Nov 7 09:51, David Rothenberger wrote:
I had to rebaseall to 0x6500 to get ruby to work. I encountered a
hang when trying to build subversion 1.4.0 until I rebased. Worked great
after that, though.
Uh, not that I actually *like* to hear t
On Nov 7 09:51, David Rothenberger wrote:
> On 11/2/2006 2:48 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >The new memory allocation scheme could result in the necessity to rebase
> >again. The usual base address of 0x7000 for rebase *might* result
> >in problems with applications using mmap and runtime lo
On 11/2/2006 2:48 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
The important change here is a slightly different memory allocation
scheme. I'd like to hear if this version still runs fine on all OSes,
not only on Vista so I'd appreciate some feedback in terms of memory
allocation problems. Please look for messa
On Nov 7 17:50, Michael Schaap wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >The latest developer snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ contains
> >a couple of patches which are supposed to get Cygwin running better on
> >the upcoming Windows Vista.
> >
> >The important change here is a slig
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi,
The latest developer snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ contains
a couple of patches which are supposed to get Cygwin running better on
the upcoming Windows Vista.
The important change here is a slightly different memory allocation
scheme. I'd like to hear i
On Nov 7 12:46, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
> > Corinna Vinschen writes:
>
> > Hi,
> > The latest developer snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ contains
> > a couple of patches which are supposed to get Cygwin running better on
> > the upcoming Windows Vista.
>
> > The
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> Hi,
> The latest developer snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ contains
> a couple of patches which are supposed to get Cygwin running better on
> the upcoming Windows Vista.
> The important change here is a slightly different memory all
- Original Message -
From: "Corinna Vinschen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 9:48 AM
Subject: Please test the latest developer's snapshot
Hi,
The latest developer snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ contains
a couple of patches
Hi,
The latest developer snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ contains
a couple of patches which are supposed to get Cygwin running better on
the upcoming Windows Vista.
The important change here is a slightly different memory allocation
scheme. I'd like to hear if this version still runs
12 matches
Mail list logo
