On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:00 PM, David Eisner wrote:
> Cygwin versions (2.8.7 and 2.5.8 respectively). When I get a chance,
> I'll try the newer versions on Linux and see what happens.
Also works fine on Linux with patch 2.5.8 (and diff 2.9 -- version
2.8.7 was never a stable release, I think).
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Spiro Trikaliotis
wrote:
> No: patch is very picky here. From my experience, you will observe the
> same behaviour on a Linux machine.
I just tried it on a Linux box. The patch succeeded with both dos-
and unix-style line endings there, too (as with Solaris 10).
Hello David,
* On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 03:15:13PM -0400 David Eisner wrote:
> I'm running into a problem when applying patches. Here's a toy
> example. I have a file, test.txt, with a one line change. I use diff
> -u to generate a patch, and then I use patch to apply it.
>
> With unix-style li
I'm running into a problem when applying patches. Here's a toy
example. I have a file, test.txt, with a one line change. I use diff
-u to generate a patch, and then I use patch to apply it.
With unix-style line-endings (\n), everything works fine:
$ file {a,b}/test.txt
a/test.txt: ASCII text
b/
4 matches
Mail list logo