On 01 September 2006 08:37, Schwarz, Konrad wrote:
> $ nslookup localhost
> Server: mail2.siemens.de
> Address: 139.25.208.11
>
> Non-authoritative answer:
> Name:localhost.ww002.siemens.net
> Address: 127.0.0.1
>
> $
>
> which is weird, I shouldn't have thought that nslookup return a po
> >> By the way, any idea why //localhost/C$ doesn't work?
> > do you have
> > 127.0.0.1 localhost
> > in your hosts file ?
Yes, localhost is in %SystemRoot%\System32\etc\drivers\hosts.
> No, I don't think that's it. This is netbios name
> resolution and DNS doesn't come into it; it's resol
Schwarz, Konrad wrote:
Also, someone called Interix a POS, which I can't find on
http://cygwin.com/acronyms, but I guess is derogatory (I originally
though "POsix Simulation" or something, to tell the truth). Is there a
list of reasons of the drawbacks of Interix somewhere?
Um, yeah, that woul
On 30 August 2006 16:43, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Schwarz, Konrad, le Wed 30 Aug 2006 17:39:48 +0200, a écrit :
>> By the way, any idea why //localhost/C$ doesn't work?
>
> do you have
> 127.0.0.1 localhost
> in your hosts file ?
>
No, I don't think that's it. This is netbios name resolution
Schwarz, Konrad, le Wed 30 Aug 2006 17:39:48 +0200, a écrit :
> By the way, any idea why //localhost/C$ doesn't work?
do you have
127.0.0.1 localhost
in your hosts file ?
Samuel
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.h
> > > The proposed mapping for directory `C:\' is `//./C$/' (or perhaps
> > > `//./C/').
>
> > So... why exactly do you need this? The only thing I might actually
> > support here (keeping in mind Eric's comments and CGF's clear
> > agreement with them) would be treating '//./' as a special cas
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of mwoehlke
> > The proposed mapping for directory `C:\' is `//./C$/' (or perhaps
> > `//./C/').
> So... why exactly do you need this? The only thing I might
> actually support here (keeping in mind
Schwarz, Konrad wrote:
Hi,
I know that it is kind of late :-), but I would like to suggest an
alternative/additional mapping of drive letters to the MinGW and Cygwin
file-system name space.
The proposed mapping for directory `C:\' is `//./C$/' (or perhaps
`//./C/').
The reasons for this mappin
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 06:13:34AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>According to Schwarz, Konrad on 8/25/2006 1:57 AM:
>>I know that it is kind of late :-), but I would like to suggest an
>>alternative/additional mapping of drive letters to the MinGW and Cygwin
>>file-system name space.
>>
>>The proposed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Schwarz, Konrad on 8/25/2006 1:57 AM:
> Hi,
>
> I know that it is kind of late :-), but I would like to suggest an
> alternative/additional mapping of drive letters to the MinGW and Cygwin
> file-system name space.
>
> The proposed mappi
Hi,
I know that it is kind of late :-), but I would like to suggest an
alternative/additional mapping of drive letters to the MinGW and Cygwin
file-system name space.
The proposed mapping for directory `C:\' is `//./C$/' (or perhaps
`//./C/').
The reasons for this mapping are:
* POSIX allows pa
11 matches
Mail list logo
