Re: PLEASE TEST: Latest cygwin snapshot == 1.5.10 alpha

On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 06:08:01PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > I'm sorry to report that the problem I described in > (multiple xterms > started in quick succession get the same PTY) still exists in the 20040519 > snapshot. The output of "p

Re: PLEASE TEST: Latest cygwin snapshot == 1.5.10 alpha

On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 09:22:28AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >> - Fix problem where simultaneous attempts to open new ptys could lead to the >> same pty being opened multiple times. (Christopher Faylor) > >As I've reported already, this isn't entirely fixed. Sigh. My new email setup real

Re: PLEASE TEST: Latest Cygwin snapshot == 1.5.10 alpha

For what it's worth, the snapshot appears to fix a problem that I've had building CVS guile -- briefly: the built guile would (when used to build the documentation) immediately die with an error message from Windows. I'd be happy to provide more details if anyone's interested. -- If you can't cha

Re: PLEASE TEST: Latest Cygwin snapshot == 1.5.10 alpha

On May 20 09:22, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > BTW, should /dev/kmem work also? No, only /dev/mem and /dev/port are working. /dev/kmem is still looking for a contributor. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Co-Project Leader mailto:[

Re: PLEASE TEST: Latest Cygwin snapshot == 1.5.10 alpha

On Thu, 20 May 2004, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Hi, > > since we're heading with big steps towards Cygwin version 1.5.10, I'd > like to encourage as many of you as possible to give the latest developer > snapshot a test. > > http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ > > Many bugfixes and some interesting chan

PLEASE TEST: Latest Cygwin snapshot == 1.5.10 alpha

Hi, since we're heading with big steps towards Cygwin version 1.5.10, I'd like to encourage as many of you as possible to give the latest developer snapshot a test. http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ Many bugfixes and some interesting changes have been made and some new functionality have been added