On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) wrote:
> Scenario:
> I launch a task at normal priority (nice-ness 0)
> When this task has finished I wish to be paged...
>
> In other words;
> Question: Can I have one task be postponed while another one
>is still executing?
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
> Of Igor Pechtchanski
> On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) wrote:
--8<--
> > *The point* is beeing able to launch the time/cpu-consuming
> task and then
> > "append" the paging later.
> >
> > The obvious is to concat
Scenario:
I launch a task at normal priority (nice-ness 0)
When this task has finished I wish to be paged...
In other words;
Question: Can I have one task be postponed while another one
is still executing?
Is this possible?
e.g. a command sequence that might take a long time:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
> Of Jon LaBadie
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 07:42:04PM +0200, Hannu E K Nevalainen
> (garbage mail) wrote:
--8<--
> > *The point* is beeing able to launch the time/cpu-consuming
> > task and then "append" the paging later.
> >
> > The o
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 07:42:04PM +0200, Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) wrote:
>
> Scenario:
> I launch a task at normal priority (nice-ness 0)
> When this task has finished I wish to be paged...
>
> In other words;
> Question: Can I have one task be postponed while another one
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
